Lincoln College: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyDfE school register: Further educationEducationEast MidlandsLincoln

Registry IDGB-UKPRN-10003928Websitelincolncollege.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3-50% vs prior 12 months (6)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£917knet · on 3 of 3 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 9 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(9 notices)
    9 of 9 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open44%(4 notices)
    4 of 9 notices are Open (44%).
  • Direct award33%(3 notices)
    3 of 9 notices are Direct award (33%).
  • Limited / restricted22%(2 notices)
    2 of 9 notices are Limited / restricted (22%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

26indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

84 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 9 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 9 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

18.6% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
SYLVESTER KEAL LIMITED116.7%114 Jun 2025
FUSION SECURITY SERVICES LTD116.7%116 Jun 2025
PUGH COMPUTERS LIMITED116.7%112 Jun 2025
GELDER LIMITED116.7%1114 Apr 2025
Viridis Building Services Ltd116.7%1116 Apr 2025
Bauer Radio Limited116.7%119 Jul 2025

6 awarded procedures across 6 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£917kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 3 of 3 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£156k middle valuemoderate · n=3Middle half £123k–£414k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Security Staffing and Associated ServicesFUSION SECURITY SERVICES LTD6 Jun 20252 yrs · up to 3 yrs£672,000
≈ £336k/yr
Salix Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme (PSDS) Phase 4Viridis Building Services Ltd16 Apr 20252.9 yrs£155,623
≈ £53k/yr
Microsoft Licenses RenewalPUGH COMPUTERS LIMITED2 Jun 20251 yrs · up to 2 yrs£89,408
≈ £89k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

1 of 1 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Security Staffing and Associated ServicesFUSION SECURITY SERVICES LTD31 Jul 2027£672,000

Recent procedures

Latest 9 of 9 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Lincoln College - Window Glazing Replacement - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple BuildingDouble-glazed unitsAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026£0
Lincoln College Loft Insulation - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple BuildingBuilding installation workAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026£0
Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple BuildingHeatingAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026£0
Security Staffing and Associated ServicesPublic security servicesAwarded / complete22 Jul 2025£825,000
Digital Radio AdvertisingAwarded / complete9 Jul 2025—
Supply and Install Kitchen EquipmentAwarded / complete20 Jun 2025—
Microsoft Licenses RenewalAwarded / complete20 Jun 2025—
Salix Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme (PSDS) Phase 4Awarded / complete17 Apr 2025—
Old Bakery Frontage WorksAwarded / complete15 Apr 2025—

Search all 9 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 1 of 1 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.