MERSEYRAIL ELECTRICS 2002 LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Private Limited Company·North West England·Liverpool
Companies House04356933 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
48 Software package and information systems2 procedures · 40%45 Construction work1 procedure · 20%64 Postal and telecommunications services1 procedure · 20%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet1 procedure · 20%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 5 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract80%(4 notices)
4 of 5 notices are Contract (80%).Framework20%(1 notice)
1 of 5 notices is Framework (20%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Selective60%(3 notices)
3 of 5 notices are Selective (60%).Direct award20%(1 notice)
1 of 5 notices is Direct award (20%).Open20%(1 notice)
1 of 5 notices is Open (20%).
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 5 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zellis UK Ltd | 2 | 25% | 2 | 2 | 2 Oct 2026 |
| C Spencer Limited | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Kier Highways Limited | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| VALLUM PROJECTS LIMITED | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Simon Dean Electrical | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Amalgamated Construction Ltd | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Construction Marine Limited | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
| MPH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | — |
8 awarded procedures across 19 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
7 of 19 contracts carry an end date, 7 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash in Transit Services | G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Limited | 25 Nov 2026 estimated | £1,041,944 |
Recent procedures
Latest 24 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICESHealth services | Planned | 8 Jun 2022 | — |
| Penalty Fare SoftwareSoftware package and information systems | Planned | 13 May 2022 | — |
| Station Information and Surveillance Systems and Alarm MaintenanceRepair and maintenance services of audio-visual and optical equipment | Planned | 11 Aug 2021 | — |
| Facilities ManagementCleaning services | Awarded / complete | 22 Jul 2021 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 7 of 19 published contracts have an end date; 7 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.