NHS Business Services Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Special health authorityNHS ODS: SPECIAL HEALTH AUTHORITY (SPHA)Central governmentNorth East EnglandNewcastle upon Tyne

Official UK PPONPRLZ-1599-JGTTWebsitenhsbsa.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months49+36% vs prior 12 months (36)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot2.533.3% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 68 awarded procedures · 58 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

68 awarded tenders, 58 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2413 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£42mnet · on 42 of 42 published values · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 85 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(85 notices)
    85 of 85 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award39%(33 notices)
    33 of 85 notices are Direct award (39%).
  • Route not published39%(33 notices)
    33 of 85 notices are Route not published (39%).
  • Open11%(9 notices)
    9 of 85 notices are Open (11%).
  • Limited / restricted7%(6 notices)
    6 of 85 notices are Limited / restricted (7%).
  • Selective5%(4 notices)
    4 of 85 notices are Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5robust · n=633.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

52 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 85 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 85 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

6.2% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Oracle Corporation UK Limited57.4%1510 Feb 2026
Kofax34.4%1327 Feb 2026
KPMG22.9%22—
NLA Media Access Limited22.9%22—
Meta22.9%2216 Jul 2025
QA Limited22.9%22—
GitLab UK Ltd22.9%1220 Mar 2026
Verint Systems UK Limited22.9%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 68 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 58 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£42mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 42 of 42 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 93%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£54k middle valuerobust · n=42Middle half £26k–£172k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme Medical AssessmentsMAXIMUS UK SERVICES LIMITED22 Dec 20253.8 yrs · up to 5.8 yrs£22,562,500
≈ £5.9m/yr
McCloud RSS Administration Service ContinuationPaymaster (1836) Limited20 Mar 20261.3 yrs£6,500,000
≈ £5.2m/yr
McCloud RSS Administration Service ContinuationEQ Paymaster—1.2 yrs · up to 1.4 yrs£6,500,000 †
≈ £5.6m/yr
Work Force Management SolutionVerint Systems UK Limited——£2,958,347 †
Media BuyingWavemaker Ltd8 Jul 20263.8 yrs£320,400
≈ £85k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

42 of 61 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 24 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 132 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Electronic Drug Tariff SupportAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Business Continuity Testing Exercise - RFIBusiness analysis consultancy servicesPlanning21 Oct 2026£40,000
C463372 Bounty Advertising 2026Awarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Director of Data & AI RecruitmentAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
C443317 Pay the BSA by Card - Card IVRFinancial and insurance servicesPlanning5 Oct 2026£400,000
W175751 Media BuyingAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026—
W84076 Healthy Start Vitamins - Subject Matter ExpertAnalysis servicesAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026£121,000
Warehouse File Tracking SoftwareBar code scanning equipmentAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026£175,000
C436616 Research Delivery Data Intelligence (RDDI) SolutionDevelopment software packageAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026£30,000,000
MSc in Major Programme ManagementAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
Quality Coach TrainingAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
Work Force Management SolutionIT software packageAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
BAME Leadership ProgrammeAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Web Application Firewalls and Load Balancers and LicencesAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Secure Bulk Destruction & Disposal of Confidential WasteArchive destruction servicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026£198,000
People Science TrainingAwarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Insight Cloud Services 26-27Awarded / complete20 Jul 2026—
W231259 Meta Advertising July/August CampaignsAwarded / complete16 Jul 2026—
Request for Information (RFI) Scanning and Digital Print SuiteArchive servicesPlanning7 Jul 2026£0
W189844 NLA Media Access License 2025/26Awarded / complete30 Jun 2026—

Search all 132 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 42 of 61 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.