The Arts Council of England: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentNorth West EnglandManchester

Official UK PPONPBGY-4385-GQGP

Open now1next deadline 16 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months35+35% vs prior 12 months (26)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share15%of 62 awarded procedures · 59 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

62 awarded tenders, 59 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months71 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.5mnet · on 51 of 51 published values · top 5 = 76%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
ACE 1122 ITQ - 'Artsmark 25 Young People Commissioners' Project Partner16 Nov 202618d£15,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

73 Research and development services3 procedures · 5% · 1 open
80 Education and training services1 procedure · 2% · 1 open
92 Recreational, cultural and sporting1 procedure · 2% · 1 open

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 61 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(60 notices)
    60 of 61 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(1 notice)
    1 of 61 notices is Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award62%(38 notices)
    38 of 61 notices are Direct award (62%).
  • Limited / restricted16%(10 notices)
    10 of 61 notices are Limited / restricted (16%).
  • Open15%(9 notices)
    9 of 61 notices are Open (15%).
  • Selective5%(3 notices)
    3 of 61 notices are Selective (5%).
  • Route not published2%(1 notice)
    1 of 61 notices is Route not published (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 61 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 61 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

7% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
NG-IT Limited46.5%44—
Mphasis UK Limited34.8%331 Sept 2026
Magellan Point Limited23.2%22—
NLA Media Access Limited23.2%22—
Humsa fr23.2%22—
M-hance Limited23.2%22—
Access UK Ltd23.2%22—
Steer Davies & Gleave Ltd11.6%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 62 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 59 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.5mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 51 of 51 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 76%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£35k middle valuerobust · n=51Middle half £22k–£64k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Digital Development PartnerMphasis UK Limited1 Sept 20263 yrs£5,000,000
≈ £1.7m/yr
ACE 669 - All In Member Services Hub delivery partnerThis Named Company Ltd trading as The Card Network——£411,464 †
CRM Business Continuity ResolutionM-hance Limited—8 mo£108,950 †
HR & Payroll SaaS systemAccess UK Ltd—2 yrs£99,988 †
≈ £50k/yr
DDAT Architecture as a ServiceMichael Page International Recruitment Limited—5 mo · up to 1.4 yrs£96,500 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

58 of 59 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 79 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Evaluation of Cultural Development FundAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
ACE 1012 ITQ - Cultural Education Network One-to-One EvaluationEvaluation consultancy servicesOpen3 Sept 2026£15,000
Digital Development PartnerAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Digital Development PartnerAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Digital Development PartnerAwarded / complete2 Sept 2026—
Provision of Offsite Backup for Critical data centre serversAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Data Centre support and maintenance contractAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Payroll Bureau ServicesAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026—
HR & Payroll SaaS systemAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026—
Project Management Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
English Libraries Insight platform - data transfer servicesAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
ACE 1094 DAC - Media Copyright LicenceAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026—
Evaluation of the Cultural Development FundEconomic research servicesOpen29 Apr 2026£83,333
Evaluation of Museum Development Small Grant ProgrammesAwarded / complete2 Apr 2026—
ACE 1086 DAC - Artsmark Service Redesign Phase 2Awarded / complete24 Mar 2026—
ACE 1081 DCA Audience Agency Postcode AnalysisAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026—
ACE 1070 DAC - Artsmark Service RedesignAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026—
ACE 1074 DAC - Action Learning Sets for CPP DirectorsAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026—
ACE 1073 DAC - Let’s Create Peer Learning community networking hubAwarded / complete18 Mar 2026—
Futures Literacy in Practice TrainingAwarded / complete23 Jan 2026—

Search all 79 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 58 of 59 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.