Official UK procurement notice
Consanguinity workforce development programme
Authority: Bolton Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThis project will deliver a culturally competent workforce development programme to equip frontline professionals, initially midwives and health visitors and later wider family support staff, with the knowledge and skills needed to support families affected by inherited genetic conditions associated with consanguinity. Through a programme of hybrid training sessions, e-learning resources and evaluation activities, the provider will improve awareness of genetic risk, enhance confidence in discussing sensitive issues with families, strengthen referral pathways to genetic and screening services, and promote informed decision-making, with the overall aim of improving access to support services, earlier identification of at-risk families and more equitable health outcomes.
CPV: Miscellaneous health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1The project will deliver a workforce development programme to improve frontline…Planned
The project will deliver a workforce development programme to improve frontline professionals' knowledge, confidence and cultural competence in supporting families affected by inherited genetic conditions associated with consanguinity. The programme aims to improve equity of access to genetic counselling, screening and support services by ensuring professionals are able to identify genetic risk factors, engage sensitively with families, and make appropriate referrals to specialist services.
The training will initially target midwives and health visitors, with a second phase extending to other frontline professionals, including family hub staff. Delivery will consist of a structured programme of approximately two-hour training sessions delivered through a hybrid model of face-to-face and virtual learning over a 12 to 18 month period. Participants will also receive supporting e-learning materials and resources.
The appointed provider will be required to develop and deliver training covering the relationship between consanguinity and inherited genetic conditions, family history assessment, culturally sensitive communication, referral pathways to genetic services, informed consent, and reducing stigma and misconceptions. The training should equip participants with practical skills to support informed decision-making and improve access to appropriate healthcare services.
The programme will include an evaluation framework measuring improvements in workforce knowledge, confidence and practice, alongside longer-term indicators such as referral rates to genetic services, quality of clinical records, uptake of screening services and patient experience. Expected outcomes include earlier identification of at-risk families, improved professional confidence, enhanced understanding of screening and treatment options, and more culturally competent care.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Bolton Council buys Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514), and who usually turns up
Bolton Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in North West England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 55 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0% / 8%
2–314% / 42%
4–614% / 33%
7+71% / 17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate54% / 33%
Within ±2%31% / 22%
Above estimate15% / 44%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1The project will deliver a workforce development programme to improve frontline…CPV 8514Published estimate£15k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 12 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid8%
2–342%
4–633%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 30 Sept 2026, 10:49 BST
- Last source update
- 30 Sept 2026, 10:49 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-092225- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077d3dFind a Tender
Publisher note: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The intention is to award a contract using the most suitable provider process.
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
30 Sept 2026 → 30 Oct 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published26 days ago30 Sept 2026, 10:49 BST
- Today27 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 2 days30 Oct 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.