Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 12 Aug 2026, 13:26 BST

Official UK procurement notice

National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL)

Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Health & Social Care (85) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£1,302,548pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 30 Sept 2030 · up to 30 Sept 2032 with extensions · starts 1 Oct 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The National Audit of Care at the End of Life will be for NHS-funded care in England, Wales and Jersey (inclusion other devolved nations/Crown dependencies is yet to be determined and will be detailed within the tender documentation).

The initial contract is anticipated to be for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £ 1,085,457.00 excluding VAT and £1,302,548.40 including VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. Due to the unknowns in advance of holding the premarket engagement session, it is currently expected that the extension value will be a 2 year pro rata of the core 3 year funding, estimated at £723,638 excluding VAT.

The values stated may be subject to change and the final values will be given when the tender goes live.

There is potential to include other Devolved Nations and/or Crown Dependencies, and aspirational measures (which will be defined in the service specification).

The role of a national clinical audit is to stimulate healthcare quality improvement through the provision of high-quality information on the organisation, delivery and outcomes of healthcare, together with tools and support to enable healthcare providers and other audiences to make best use of this information. Outcomes are benchmarked against available national guidance and standards from established professional and patient sources.

Every year, over 550,000 people die in England and Wales, almost half in hospital, and in most cases death can be anticipated. There is only one chance to get care right for a dying person and those people important to them. It is essential that this is high quality and delivered compassionately by caring and competent staff.

Accordingly, the National Audit of Care at the End of Life is expected to:

Develop a robust, high-quality audit designed around key quality metrics likely to best support local and national healthcare quality improvement

Detect, describe and help reduce unwarranted clinical variation by systematically benchmarking performance, identifying outliers, and supporting services to understand variation in outcomes, processes and experience

Achieve, articulate and maintain close alignment with relevant NICE national guidance and quality standards throughout the audit, as appropriate

Enable healthcare quality improvement through the provision of timely, high-quality data that compares providers of healthcare, and comprises an integrated mixture of named Trust or Health board, Integrated Care System (ICS), commissioner, multidisciplinary team (MDT), possibly consultant or clinical team level and other levels of reporting

Engage patients, carers and the public in a meaningful way, achieving a strong patient voice which informs and contributes to the design, functioning, outputs and direction of the audit

Consider the value and feasibility of linking data at an individual patient level to other relevant national datasets either from the outset or in the future, and plan for these linkages from the inception of the contract

Ensure robust methodological and statistical input at all stages of the audit

Identify from the outset the full range of audiences for the reports and other audit outputs, and plan and tailor them accordingly

Provide audit results in a timely, accessible and meaningful manner to support healthcare quality improvement, minimising the reporting delay and providing continual access to each unit for their own data

Use strong and effective project and programme management to deliver audit outputs on time and within budget

Develop and maintain strong engagement with local clinicians, networks, commissioners, patients and their families and carers and charity and community support groups to drive improvements in services

The delivery of this audit is expected to include information that enables assessment of end-of-life care from multiple perspectives, including those from:

Patients

Bereaved people

Staff

The organisational context in which care is delivered

The anticipated outputs are:

Near real-time dynamic and interactive metric results

Publication of an annual state of the nation report

Quality improvement resources

Resources for patients near the end of life, and those important to them

The identification and notification of outliers

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrs
Contract period: 1 Oct 2027 – 30 Sept 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 30 Sept 2032 with extensions
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
The marketHealth services (CPV 8510) · Greater London (authority’s region)
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=275
0%29%

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no winner locations published · market: CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=386
—51%

No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 decided notices · market: CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=23
81 days65 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 81 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 6 of 6 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=290
100%73%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
100% had one bid
The market60 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region)
32% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid100% / 32%
Buyer: 5 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 60 lots with published bid counts.
2–30% / 32%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 60 lots with published bid counts.
4–60% / 23%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 14 of 60 lots with published bid counts.
7+0% / 13%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 60 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 3 lots with estimate and award, 5 needed · broad CPV 85
The market41 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · Greater London (authority’s region)
39% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate39%
Market: 16 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%54%
Market: 22 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate7%
Market: 3 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 851036 monthsPublished estimate£1.3m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 60 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet32% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 60 similar lots
1 bid32%
19 of 60 similar past lots received 1 bid (32%).
2–332%
19 of 60 similar past lots received 2–3 (32%).
4–623%
14 of 60 similar past lots received 4–6 (23%).
7+13%
8 of 60 similar past lots received 7+ (13%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.3m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueWhy listed
Royal College of PsychiatristsEarlier contractNational Audit of Eating Disordersnotice published Aug 2024NATIONAL AUDIT OF EATING DISORDERS£1.3mMatched as the earlier contract

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
12 Aug 2026, 13:26 BST
Last source update
14 Aug 2026, 09:46 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-077512
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e297 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

12 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2027 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published78 days ago
    12 Aug 2026, 13:26 BST
  2. Latest notice published76 days ago
    14 Aug 2026, 09:46 BST
  3. Market engagement42 days ago
    16 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST

    Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) is seeking to engage with the market on the commissioning of the NACEL.

    HQIP will be looking to hold a pre-market engagement session with potential suppliers on Wednesday 16 September 2026 from 12.00 to 13.55.

    Also in attendance will be system partners and service specialists including charities, professional bodies and other relevant stakeholders.

    The aim of the pre market engagement session is for interested parties to hear and contribute to discussions with system experts and patient groups that will feed in to HQIP’s final decisions on the scope of the project over the 3-5 years of the programme.

    At this point, the Authority is planning to run this procurement under an open tender process.

    The proposed dates (subject to change solely at the Authorities discretion) are as follows:

    16 September 2026 – Pre-Market Engagement Session

    Publication of tender opportunity – December 2026

    Evaluation of submitted bids – February/March 2027

    Award – July 2027

    Contract start – 01 October 2027

    If you would like to join this premarket engagement event, please complete the following Microsoft form: National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL) – Fill in form by close of business Wednesday 9th September 2026.

    gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com ↗

  4. Today
    29 Oct 2026
  5. Contract startsin 336 days
    1 Oct 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 12 Aug 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    12 Aug 2026, 13:26 BST
    UK2
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    14 Aug 2026, 09:46 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd

Contracting authorityPublic undertaking GB-PPON: PVVQ-6113-CJWD c/o Buzzacott LLP, 130 Wood Street, London, London, EC2V 6DLContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure