Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 5 Jun 2026, 16:05 BST

Official UK procurement notice

National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settings

Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Health & Social Care (85) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£1,146,300pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 1 Apr 2030 · up to 31 Mar 2032 with extensions · starts 1 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The National Infection and Sepsis Audit – Acute NHS settings (NISA-Acute) will be for NHS-funded acute hospital care in England and Wales (inclusion of other Devolved Nations/Crown dependencies is yet to be determined and will be detailed within the tender documentation).

The initial contract is anticipated to be for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £ 1,146,300.00 excl VAT and £1,375,560.00 with VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. Due to the unknowns in advance of holding the premarket engagement session, it is currently expected that the extension value will be a 2 year pro rata of the core 3 year funding, estimated at £743,300.00 excluding VAT.

Further to this funding, the final specification will contain a list of aspirational measures which will be expected to be modified into the contract should the need and funding become available. The aspirational intent value is unknown at the point of drafting this notice, This aspirational intent has the potential to be invoked fully, partially, or not at all, and the Authority cannot guarantee that the successful provider will be required to do any of the aspirational measures that will be listed in the final specification.

The values stated may be subject to change and the final values will be given when the tender goes live.

The role of a national clinical audit is to stimulate healthcare improvement and reduce unwarranted variation through the provision of high-quality information on the organisation, delivery and outcomes of healthcare, together with tools and support to enable healthcare providers and other audiences to make best use of this information. Performance and outcomes metrics are benchmarked against national guidance and standards e.g. quality standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and those from other established professional and patient sources.

For all HQIP-commissioned national clinical audits, the default expectation is that existing, routinely collected digital data will be used wherever available, and bespoke collection of data is avoided unless there is no other means of sourcing the data capable of meeting the needs of the project. Potential sources of existing digital data can include national data collections (for example, Hospital Episode Statistics and the Patient Episode Database for Wales), and Electronic Patient Records (EPR) data (whether from the system providers or via local data extraction and upload). Data is most useful locally for healthcare improvement when its provision to clinical teams is timely, the data is refreshed regularly and appropriate tools, support and guidance accompany the data outputs. The intent is for all of these features of the audit to be implemented and improved during the period of this contract.

This audit programme is expected to:

a)Develop a robust, high-quality audit designed around key quality indicators likely to best support local and national quality improvement;

b)Achieve, articulate and maintain close alignment with relevant NICE national guidance and quality standards throughout the audit, as appropriate;

c)Enable improvements through the provision of timely, high-quality data that compares providers of healthcare, and comprises an integrated mixture of named trust, health board, commissioner, MDT, possibly consultant or clinical team level and other levels of reporting;

d) Engage parents, carers and families in a meaningful way, achieving a strong patient voice which informs and contributes to the design, functioning, outputs and direction of the audit;

e)Consider the value and feasibility of additional data linkage, at an individual patient level, to other relevant national datasets either from the outset or in the future, and plan for these linkages from the inception of the contract;

f)Ensure robust methodological and statistical input at all stages of the audit;

g)Identify from the outset the full range of audiences for the results and other audit outputs, and plan and tailor them accordingly;

h)Provide audit results in a timely, accessible and meaningful manner to support quality improvements, minimising the reporting delay and providing continual access to each unit for their own data;

i)Utilise strong and effective project and programme management to deliver audit outputs on time and within budget; and

j)Develop and maintain strong engagement with local clinicians, networks, commissioners, patients and their families and carers and charity and community support groups in order to drive improvements in services.

HQIP and the funders have begun early conversations considering key features of the NISA-Acute audit. The initial intention is an audit that focuses on:

  1. early stages of the hospital emergency department and inpatient infection/sepsis care pathway
  2. inclusion of all patients (both children and adults)
  3. inclusion of both those newly admitted to hospital with infection/sepsis and those already in hospital for other reasons (hospital-onset infections)

Other in-hospital components of the infection/sepsis care pathway could also be included in the specification, potentially as future ‘modules’ invoked under aspirational intent.

In terms of the potential scale of the audit:

there are around 1 million emergency admissions with infection as the primary diagnosis;

in NHS acute hospitals, around a third of inpatients are taking antibiotics at any given time.

Given the potential size of the cohort, it is likely that potential suppliers will need to consider possible approaches to maximise the utility of the audit dataset on a limited budget - such combining use of of routine administrative data plus representative sampling of the care of relevant patients.

This description is based on preliminary discussions and is subject to change.

For more information about this opportunity, please visit the eSourcing portal at:

www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London… ↗

To respond to this opportunity, please click here:

www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/KG24AH4NP5 ↗

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrs
Contract period: 1 Apr 2027 – 1 Apr 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 31 Mar 2032 with extensions
Delivery: UK
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
The marketHealth services (CPV 8510) · UK-wide
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=2,281
0%53%

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no winner locations published · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=3,025
—79%

No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 decided notices · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=93
81 days59 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 81 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 6 of 6 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=2,264
100%76%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
100% had one bid
The market488 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · UK-wide
24% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid100% / 24%
Buyer: 5 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 118 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
2–30% / 33%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 159 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
4–60% / 26%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 128 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
7+0% / 17%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 83 of 488 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 3 lots with estimate and award, 5 needed · broad CPV 85
The market300 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · UK-wide
36% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate36%
Market: 107 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%58%
Market: 175 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate6%
Market: 18 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 851036 monthsPublished estimate£1.1m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 488 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet24% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 488 similar lots
1 bid24%
118 of 488 similar past lots received 1 bid (24%).
2–333%
159 of 488 similar past lots received 2–3 (33%).
4–626%
128 of 488 similar past lots received 4–6 (26%).
7+17%
83 of 488 similar past lots received 7+ (17%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.1m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
5 Jun 2026, 16:05 BST
Last source update
5 Jun 2026, 16:05 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-053491
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06af12 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

5 Jun 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published145 days ago
    5 Jun 2026, 16:05 BST
  2. Market engagement120 days ago
    29 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST

    Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) is seeking to engage with the market on the commissioning of the NISA-Acute.

    HQIP will be looking to hold a pre-market engagement session with potential suppliers on Monday 6th July 2026 from 11.30hrs to 13.15hrs.

    Also in attendance will be system partners and service specialists including charities, professional bodies and other relevant stakeholders.

    The aim of the pre market engagement session is for interested parties to hear and contribute to discussions with system experts and patient groups that will feed in to HQIP’s final decisions on the scope of the project over the 3-5 years of the programme.

    At this point, the Authority is planning to run this procurement under an open tender process.

    The proposed dates (subject to change solely at the Authorities discretion) are as follows:

    6th July 2026 - Pre Market Engagement Session

    Publication of tender opportunity – September 2026

    Evaluation of submitted bids –November / December 2026

    Award – December 2026 / January 2027

    Contract start - 1st April 2027

    If you would like to join this premarket engagement event, please complete the following Microsoft form

    gbr01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com ↗

    Fill in form by close of business Monday 29th June 2026.

  3. Today
    28 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 154 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    5 Jun 2026, 16:05 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PVVQ-6113-CJWD 128 City Road, London, London, EC1V 2NXContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure