Official UK procurement notice
Neighbourhood Health Optimisation Service (NHOS)
Authority: NHS NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK INTEGRATED CARE BOARD (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Neighbourhood Health Optimisation Service (NHOS) is proposed to test a standardised, at-scale primary care led approach to identifying and addressing reversible risk of unplanned admission to hospital, initially in patients aged 65 and over, while their risk is still modifiable. By using Population Health Management to identify people with medium/high rising and reversible risk, the NHOS can intervene before people deteriorate, become frail or deconditioned, present in crisis, or require avoidable acute, ambulance, primary care and social care input.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1Across Norfolk and Waveney, there are identifiable groups of people whose health is…Planned
Across Norfolk and Waveney, there are identifiable groups of people whose health is not being optimised consistently. Long-term conditions are not always managed to the best possible standard, and modifiable or reversible clinical and social risk factors are not always identified and acted on early enough to prevent deterioration.
There is significant variation between practices, Primary Care Networks and Places in how effectively proactive population health management is delivered. As a result, patients with similar levels of need may receive different levels of identification, engagement, review, intervention and follow-up depending on where they are registered.
This variation is likely to contribute to avoidable deterioration and greater use of unplanned care, including emergency admissions and bed days that could potentially have been prevented if the system had used the information already available to intervene earlier. Population Health Management analysis shows that a relatively small proportion of the population accounts for a disproportionately large share of unplanned activity. It also identifies a larger group whose risk is rising but remains modifiable, creating a significant opportunity for earlier intervention.
The ICB has an increasingly sophisticated Population Health Management capability to identify people whose clinical risk of unplanned admission to hospital is rising and potentially reversible. However, there is not currently a consistent delivery mechanism at sufficient scale to systematically engage those patients, coordinate appropriate interventions and track whether their risk subsequently reduces following intervention.
The Neighbourhood Health Optimisation Service (NHOS) is proposed to test a standardised, at-scale primary care led approach to identifying and addressing reversible risk of unplanned admission to hospital, initially in patients aged 65 and over, while their risk is still modifiable. By using Population Health Management to identify people with medium/high rising and reversible risk, the NHOS can intervene before people deteriorate, become frail or deconditioned, present in crisis, or require avoidable acute, ambulance, primary care and social care input.
Purpose of this notice
The ICB is looking to invite providers to participate in the development of the NHOS Phase 1 business case as development partners. A credible, costed business case to support the implementation of Phase 1 of NHOS cannot be produced by the ICB alone. It needs a provider perspective on the operating model, the workforce that can realistically be recruited and deployed in Norfolk and Waveney, mobilisation timescales, and the true cost of delivery.
Scope of services
The ICB is seeking development partners to work collaboratively with the ICB and relevant system partners to develop a robust and costed business case for Phase 1 of the Neighbourhood Health Optimisation Service.
The business case will need to be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate that the proposed service is clinically credible, operationally deliverable, affordable, safe and capable of mobilisation at the required scale.
The development partner will help with the development of the following:
- Service specification and operating model
- Patient identification and access
- Clinical model and standards
- Workforce and capacity plan
- Primary care delivery arrangements
- Mobilisation and implementation plan
- Open-book financial model
- Activity, capacity and demand assumptions
- Outcomes and performance framework:
- Evaluation and benefits realisation:
- Quality, clinical governance and safeguarding
- Information governance, data and digital requirements
- Risk and contingency arrangements
- Engagement and co-design evidence
The development partner will be required to participate in the joint Project Group, including attendance by appropriately authorised clinical, operational, financial and commercial representatives; completion of agreed actions; early notification of issues; maintenance of accurate assumptions and risks; and contribution to drafting and quality assuring the business case.
The ICB will retain ownership of the overall business case and responsibility for defining the commissioning requirement, confirming strategic fit, providing or validating population and baseline information, assessing affordability and value for money, completing relevant quality and equality assurance, managing conflicts of interest and obtaining all required approvals.
Provider Eligibility
Providers will meet the following criteria:
- A legal entity capable of holding an NHS Standard Contract for primary care led services;
- Demonstrable support from, or established delivery relationships with, GP practices across a substantial proportion of PCNs;
- Experience of delivering at-scale, primary care led services in Norfolk and Waveney;
- Capacity to commit clinical, operational and finance resource to the work at the provider's own cost.
Each party will meet its own costs of engaging and supporting the business case development; no payment, reimbursement or minimum income will be payable
A Memorandum of Understanding signed by the participating provider(s) and Norfolk and Suffolk ICB will underpin the period of engagement
Once the business case is developed appropriate governance will need to be undertaken to secure the funding. If funding is secured the ICB will work through the procurement options available to it and a provider selection process will be undertaken separately in accordance with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
This Prior Information Notice is to alert potential development partners to this opportunity and to request that they express an interest. To express an interest in this opportunity please contact nsicb.procurement@nhs.net prior to the 16th October 2026.
For the avoidance of doubt no additional information or documents are available on the Norfolk and Suffolk website or…
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How NHS NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK INTEGRATED CARE BOARD buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
NHS NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK INTEGRATED CARE BOARD’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 41 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid45% / 15%
2–39% / 35%
4–645% / 38%
7+0% / 12%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate0% / 41%
Within ±2%89% / 53%
Above estimate11% / 5%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Across Norfolk and Waveney, there are identifiable groups of people whose health is…CPV 8510Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 82 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid15%
2–335%
4–638%
7+12%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 25 Sept 2026, 13:39 BST
- Last source update
- 25 Sept 2026, 13:39 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-091011- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077a9cFind a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
25 Sept 2026 → 4 Jan 2027 · 2 dates- Notice published33 days ago25 Sept 2026, 13:39 BST
- Today28 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 67 days4 Jan 2027
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.