Official UK procurement notice
Qualitative Research in Land-Based Premises
Authority: Gambling Commission (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionIntroduction and Background:
The Gambling Commission is an executive non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.
The Commission is responsible for issuing personal gambling licences for individuals and gambling operating licences for businesses operating in Great Britain and we are responsible for ensuring all licensed gambling is conducted subject to the following licensing objectives:
- preventing gambling from being a source of crime or disorder, being associated with crime or disorder or being used to support crime
- ensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way
- protecting children and other vulnerable people from being harmed or exploited by gambling.
In January 2025, we published a consultation which proposed changes to our requirements on licensees, through the Gaming Machine Technical Standards (GMTS), Gaming Machine Testing Strategy (testing strategy) and the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP).
This was in connection with the commitment in the April 2023 Gambling Act Review White Paper (*1) that set out that:
“The Gambling Commission will conduct a review of its gaming machine technical standards. The review will include an assessment of the role of session limits across category B and C machines and the role of safer gambling tools. The review will consider the effects of any legislative change following the Gambling Act Review and, where appropriate, will consolidate the progress made so far by the industry on a voluntary basis.”
In January 2026, we set out our position in relation to our proposal to introduce a licence condition to more effectively address non-compliant gaming machines (*2). The new licence condition came into effect on 29 July 2026. Our September response (*3) sets out our position in relation to all other proposals within the consultation published in January 2025.
In line with fulfilling our 2024-2027 corporate strategy which includes evaluating the GAR White Paper commitments we are responsible for, the Commission will be conducting an evaluation of the changes arising from the consultation. As part of this evaluation, we are looking to procure qualitative research in land-based premises to be carried out between April 2027 and January 2029.
We envisage this will be delivered across 2 or 3 waves of fieldwork. The first wave of fieldwork will be a pilot study to collect baseline data after the session definition is introduced, and to test the feasibility of the methodology; this data collection must be carried out after 30 March 2027 and be completed by 29 June 2027. The pilot study will also be an opportunity to trial approaches for the full fieldwork, to be carried out post-implementation from 30 June 2027 and should be used to inform the wider project’s design.
Land-based fieldwork in gambling premises presents an exciting opportunity for the Commission to explore an often-underutilised methodology within gambling research; capturing the experiences and behaviours of consumers, and staff, of the policy changes in real-time and in live environments. This kind of data collection is especially powerful as it partly mitigates limitations of other qualitative approaches, such as surveys or remote interviews, which rely on consumer recall and accurate self-report. Ethnographic, fieldwork-based approaches can utilise in-person interviews or questionnaires and also incorporate methods such as observation in order to gain a more rounded view of participant experiences. We also welcome innovative or new approaches within relevant disciplines.
Please note: This project will collect data to be triangulated within the Gaming Machine evaluation, it will not be carrying out evaluation itself or producing evaluation-related outputs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose of the Engagement:
- Understand market capability to provide expertise and specialist research in land-based gambling across Great Britain; with a focus on qualitative and ethnographic methods within live, public environments that engage members of the public.
- Explore indicative cost models for the pilot study and full fieldwork
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Requirements:
Expertise and experience -
Suppliers should have demonstratable experience with relevant methodologies, and past experience of delivering successful public-facing fieldwork in Great Britain in gambling, retail or hospitality premises. Especially strong bids would have experience conducting fieldwork in different contexts across multiple locations.
Research requirements -
Methodologies should be drawn from qualitative and ethnographic approaches and aim to capture consumer experiences and behaviour, in addition to staff experiences, relating to the policy changes; this could include interviews, questionnaires, and observational data, as examples. More innovative and original methodologies in the field are welcome; especially surrounding ethnographies, play-based research, place-based approaches, and research that has explored experiences of gaming machines. For example, methods could explore the experience of, and feelings about, limit setting functionality (Proposal 4) (*4) and its potential impact on consumer play.
Depending on the chosen methodological approaches, relevant ethical approval(s) will need to be in place that follow the Commission’s Research Governance Framework (*5); including any relevant guidelines for conducting gambling research with human participants.
Locations of premises included in the fieldwork should span city and rural areas; with geographical diversity in mind across England, Wales and Scotland; for example, covering city centre to costal locations. Researchers should also anticipate some fieldwork occurring outside of regular working hours, in order to capture different times of day and levels of business in relevant venues.
There are four types of premises affected by the policy changes, and these should all be included in the research approach:
Types of premises included in the fieldwork should include:
- Casino
- Adult Gaming Centre (AGC)
- Bingo; this would include more traditional Bingo Clubs as well as high street Bingo premises
- Betting
Exact numbers of venues will vary depending on the methodological approach. We expect the pilot to cover less venues than the full fieldwork. The full fieldwork would ideally include 2 separate waves of data collection.
In more detail, the approximate number of venues the pilot & full fieldwork would include:
Please note this is anticipating an even split between Casino, AGC, Bingo and Betting premises.
- Minimum: 16 venues
- Expected: 24 venues
- Ideal: 32 + venues
These figures should be used to inform estimated minimum, expected and ideal costings.
In addition to venue coverage, ideal, expected and minimum participant sampling numbers would be established in project set up and explored via the Pilot Study to ensure a diversity of perspectives are captured; including identities that are often under-represented in gambling research.
Deliverables -
Data will be shared in clear, appropriately anonymised formats. A short report accounting the methodological approach, ethics, and any lessons learned for the Commission, would also be produced for internal use and to inform the wider Gaming Machine evaluation. The vendor must comply with all relevant legislation, including data protection (GDPR) legislation.
Timescale -
The project will have natural periods of intensity and pause due to implementation timelines. Vendors would need to be able to deliver fieldwork in windows across 2027 to early 2029.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Links to sources:
(*1) Gambling Act Review White Paper - www.gov.uk/government/publicati… ↗
(*2) January 2026 Response - www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/consultation-respons… ↗
(*3) September 2026 Response - www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/consultation-respons… ↗
(*4) Proposal 4 / September 2026 Response - www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/consultation-respons… ↗
(*5) The Commission's Research Governance Framework - www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/standards/research-g… ↗
CPV: Research services · Social research services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Gambling Commission buys Market research services (CPV 7931), and who usually turns up
Gambling Commission’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Market research services (CPV 7931) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in West Midlands (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 38 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0%
2–321%
4–614%
7+64%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate44%
Within ±2%50%
Above estimate6%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7931Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 14 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–321%
4–614%
7+64%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 6 Oct 2026, 08:50 BST
- Last source update
- 6 Oct 2026, 08:50 BST
- Authority reference
26-029- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-094048- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078141Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
6 Oct 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published21 days ago6 Oct 2026, 08:50 BST
- Today27 Oct 2026
- Market engagementin 3 days30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
Request for Information (RFI):
We are inviting interested organisations to complete our Request for Information in advance of 30th October 2026 to help inform the proposed procurement, understand market interest and capability and explore indicative cost models.
MS Forms Link - forms.cloud.microsoft/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx ↗
Please note - this RFI is issued solely for market engagement purposes. This is not a call for competition.
- Contract startsin 155 days1 Apr 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published6 Oct 2026, 08:50 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender