Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberBarnsleyRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPWHQ-6332-HXGWWebsitebarnsleyhospital.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months10+43% vs prior 12 months (7)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share35%of 17 awarded procedures · 14 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

17 awarded tenders, 14 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months82 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.2mnet · on 15 of 15 published values · top 5 = 65%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 17 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(17 notices)
    17 of 17 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award53%(9 notices)
    9 of 17 notices are Direct award (53%).
  • Limited / restricted41%(7 notices)
    7 of 17 notices are Limited / restricted (41%).
  • Route not published6%(1 notice)
    1 of 17 notices is Route not published (6%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 17 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 17 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 35% of 17 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 14 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.2mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 65%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£52k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £37k–£114k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Award of VIE enabling worksJarvale Construction Ltd—2 mo£241,649 †
Provision of Mortality BenchmarkingCHKS Limited——£150,000 †
Vascular Access AlterationsO & P Construction Services Limited—2 mo£137,596 †
Relocation of Fracture Clinic and Development of Frailty SDECJefferson Sheard—5 mo£116,167 †
Smoking Cessation - Mass Media CampaignEski Media—4 mo£111,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

16 of 17 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 18 of 17 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Medical Erostering Software Solutionprocuring entityMedical software packageAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026£930,000
BFS - Maintenance Contract for Phaco Machine (Stellaris Anterior Elite x 2)Awarded / complete18 Jun 2026—
CLWRota ERostering Service AnaestheticsAwarded / complete15 Jun 2026—
BFS Car Parking equipmentAwarded / complete2 Jun 2026—
BHNFT Psychosocial Assessment ToolAwarded / complete28 Apr 2026—
Smoking Cessation - Mass Media CampaignAwarded / complete27 Mar 2026—
BHNFT - POCT Provision of StatStrip Ketone Meters and Strips AgreementAwarded / complete6 Mar 2026—
Vascular Access AlterationsAwarded / complete18 Feb 2026—
Award of VIE enabling worksAwarded / complete5 Feb 2026—
Maintenance Contract for Xpericon Injection System x 3Awarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Refurbishment of Theatre 2 - Professional ServicesAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Air Tube Conveyor - MaintenanceAwarded / complete11 Sept 2025—
Relocation of Fracture Clinic and Development of Frailty SDECAwarded / complete18 Jul 2025—
Electrical Authorising EngineerAwarded / complete24 Apr 2025—
Air Tube Conveyor - MaintenanceAwarded / complete9 Apr 2025—
Air Tube Conveyor - MaintenanceAwarded / complete9 Apr 2025—
Air Tube Conveyor - MaintenanceAwarded / complete9 Apr 2025—
Provision of Mortality BenchmarkingData analysis servicesAwarded / complete16 Dec 2024—

Search all 17 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 16 of 17 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.