Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberBradfordRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPMJZ-5573-HMPZWebsitebradfordhospitals.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months85+240% vs prior 12 months (25)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot320% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share6%of 114 awarded procedures · 100 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

114 awarded tenders, 100 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3217 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£30mnet · on 92 of 95 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 110 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(108 notices)
    108 of 110 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 110 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award59%(65 notices)
    65 of 110 notices are Direct award (59%).
  • Limited / restricted26%(29 notices)
    29 of 110 notices are Limited / restricted (26%).
  • Open8%(9 notices)
    9 of 110 notices are Open (8%).
  • Route not published5%(5 notices)
    5 of 110 notices are Route not published (5%).
  • Selective2%(2 notices)
    2 of 110 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=1020% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

79 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 110 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

07 of 110 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Haemonetics Ltd32.6%33—
Globe Locums Ltd21.8%22—
Vapotherm UK Ltd21.8%22—
MEDINET CLINICAL SERVICES LTDframework/DPS on 121.8%22—
LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST21.8%22—
Castle Green Hotel21.8%22—
EMERGENT CROWN CONTRACT OFFICE FURNISHINGS LIMITED21.8%22—
CEDAR COURT HOTEL BRADFORD21.8%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 6% of 114 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 100 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£30mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 92 of 95 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£32k middle valuerobust · n=92Middle half £16k–£60k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
CDC Health InnovationsWestcliffe Health Innovations——£19,500,000 †
BTH25-103 Digital by Default Patient Experience Portal and Hybrid MailXEROX UK LIMITED24 Dec 20254 yrs · up to 5 yrs£2,590,321
≈ £648k/yr
BTH25-103 Digital by Default Patient Experience Portal and Hybrid MailZESTY LIMITED24 Dec 20254 yrs · up to 5 yrs£1,695,913
≈ £424k/yr
*Description managed off-site archival service for histology slides and paraffin blocksCellPath Ltd23 Apr 20265 yrs · up to 9 yrs£895,000
≈ £179k/yr
AI for Skin Cancer DetectionSkin Analytic Ltd—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£764,304 †
≈ £255k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

75 of 93 contracts carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 9 of 32 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 130 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Out-Patient Pharmaceutical Dispensing ServicesPharmacy servicesAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026£70,000,000
C471272 - Waiver for 2 x Mortuary TrolleysAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Staff Winter Vaccination ProgrammeHealth servicesAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
C469152 - Waiver for Drivers of the Deficit ReportAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Waiver for Staff Wheelchair ATW GrantAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Waiver for Falls Retrieval KitAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
C432051 - Waiver of Regeneration OvensAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Waiver for Electronic Tow TrucksAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Working Pods for the LibraryAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
C432327 - Waiver of Rapid infusers - Training and educationAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
C431468 - Mobile radiation shieldsAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
WT25-079 Connectivity Services for Mobile Breast Screening UnitsAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
C469199 - Attendances at a Critical Care CourseAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
C469199 - Attendances at a Critical Care CourseAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Oxygen Delivery Device consumablesAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Staff Winter Vaccination ProgrammeHealth servicesAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
C469065 - Waiver for Turnaround Director RoleAwarded / complete8 Sept 2026—
C463148 - Waiver for Urolase RentalAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
Waiver For QSI - Three Year Subscription: QSI (Quality Standard for Imaging)Awarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
C459692 - Recruitment Services for two Non-Executive DirectorsAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—

Search all 130 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 75 of 93 published contracts have an end date; 6 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.