Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentEast of EnglandSt IvesRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPHQR-1485-BDJQWebsitecambscommunityservices.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months13-54% vs prior 12 months (28)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot166.7% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share18%of 45 awarded procedures · 43 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

45 awarded tenders, 43 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months115 within 6 months · 6 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.0mnet · on 22 of 22 published values · top 5 = 87%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 41 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(40 notices)
    40 of 41 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Framework2%(1 notice)
    1 of 41 notices is Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted44%(18 notices)
    18 of 41 notices are Limited / restricted (44%).
  • Direct award32%(13 notices)
    13 of 41 notices are Direct award (32%).
  • Route not published12%(5 notices)
    5 of 41 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Open7%(3 notices)
    3 of 41 notices are Open (7%).
  • Selective5%(2 notices)
    2 of 41 notices are Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

1moderate · n=366.7% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 41 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

02 of 41 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
UKHSA36.7%335 Sept 2025
Aquarius Action Projects36.7%24—
Flok Health24.4%22—
Keech Hospice Care24.4%12—
Globe Locums Ltdframework/DPS on 124.4%02—
PERTEMPS MEDICAL LIMITED12.2%12—
The Counselling Foundation12.2%11—
Cardinal Health U.K. 432 Ltd12.2%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 45 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 43 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 22 of 22 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 87%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£48k middle valuerobust · n=22Middle half £11k–£214k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Children and Young People Drug and Alcohol ServicesAquarius Action Projects——£2,535,636 †
MSK AI ServiceFlok Health——£2,000,000 †
Children's Services works at North Cambs HospitalCocksedge Building Contractors Limited—6 mo£726,302 †
Beds and Luton - Childrens Assessments & ADOS AssessmentsPERTEMPS MEDICAL LIMITED——£523,923 †
CPFT, CCS - Occupational HealthPeople Asset Management Ltd——£306,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

25 of 50 contracts carry an end date, 10 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 11 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 55 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Children and Young People Drug and Alcohol ServicesRehabilitation servicesAwarded / complete28 Feb 2025—
Pathology ServicesPathology servicesAwarded / complete27 Feb 2025—
Consultant Ward RoundsCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete18 Oct 2024—
Research Management & GovernanceResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesAwarded / complete26 Sept 2024—
Drug and Alcohol Services to Children and Young PeopleRehabilitation servicesAwarded / complete10 Jul 2024—
Child Protection Medical Services for children and young peopleFrameworkHealth servicesAwarded / complete5 Jun 2024—
EHCP AssessmentsHealth servicesAwarded / complete5 Jun 2024—
Audiology AssessmentsFrameworkENT or audiologist servicesAwarded / complete30 May 2024—
EHCP AssessmentsHealth servicesPlanned2 May 2024£144,000
Purchase of services relating to development of the CCS Umbraco digital platform.FrameworkIT services: consultingAwarded / complete1 May 2024—

Search all 55 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 25 of 50 published contracts have an end date; 10 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.