Consumer Council for Water: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPCLM-3677-JYML

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months40% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot80% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Contracts ending ≤18 months41 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£2.2mnet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 97%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 8 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract88%(7 notices)
    7 of 8 notices are Contract (88%).
  • Framework13%(1 notices)
    1 of 8 notices are Framework (13%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open88%(7 notices)
    7 of 8 notices are Open (88%).
  • Selective13%(1 notices)
    1 of 8 notices are Selective (13%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

8robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 7 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

51 daysrobust · n=7
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 8 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

17 of 8 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

3.7% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Impact Research228.6%2228 Sept 2026
LITEWHITE LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1114.3%1430 Apr 2026
ELEVEN MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS LTDframework/DPS on 1114.3%1330 Apr 2026
SEVENTY7 MANCHESTER LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1114.3%1230 Apr 2026
Whistlejacket Londonframework/DPS on 1114.3%1230 Apr 2026
Design by Antonyframework/DPS on 1114.3%1230 Apr 2026
Gi Group Recruitment Limited114.3%1128 Jan 2026
Blue Marble Research114.3%1124 Nov 2025

7 awarded procedures across 11 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£2.2mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 97%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£268k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £96k–£653k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
ESTABLISHMENT MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF WATER INDUSTRY CONSUMER PANELSTaylor McKenzie Research & Marketing Ltd1 Sept 20254 yrs£799,132
≈ £200k/yr
Water Matters & New Appointments and Variations (NAVs) SurveyDJS Research Ltd23 Apr 20266 mo · up to 3.5 yrs£748,512
Recruitment PartnerGi Group Recruitment Limited28 Jan 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£368,000
≈ £184k/yr
Water Voice- Flexible Quant and Qual servicesImpact Research9 Nov 20251.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£168,296
≈ £96k/yr
Consumer focused smart metering journeysBlue Marble Research24 Nov 20253 mo£72,202

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

13 of 13 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 8 of 8 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Third Party Intermediary ResearchDesign and execution of research and developmentAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026£64,000
Water Matters & NAV SurveyMarket-testing servicesAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026£800,000
Creative & Digital Design Framework 2025Framework2 lotsAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026£160,000
Recruitment Partner RenewalHuman resources management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026£368,000
Smart Metering Longitudinal ResearchMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsOpen14 Aug 2026£320,000
Consumer focused smart metering journeysMarket research servicesAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£80,000
Water Voice- Flexible Quant and Qual servicesMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£640,000
Establishment and Management of Water Industry Consumer Panels in England and WalesResearch servicesAwarded / complete7 Nov 2025£7,903,000

Search all 8 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 13 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.