Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberDoncaster

Official UK PPONPYCP-3777-NMJZWebsitedbth.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months64+167% vs prior 12 months (24)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 74 awarded procedures · 62 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

74 awarded tenders, 62 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3019 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£3.8mnet · on 69 of 69 published values · top 5 = 23%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 88 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(82 notices)
    82 of 88 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(6 notices)
    6 of 88 notices are Framework (7%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award84%(74 notices)
    74 of 88 notices are Direct award (84%).
  • Selective9%(8 notices)
    8 of 88 notices are Selective (9%).
  • Route not published7%(6 notices)
    6 of 88 notices are Route not published (7%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 88 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 88 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership45.4%44—
Total TMJ22.7%22—
Medipex Ltd22.7%22—
Psychological Consultancy Ltd22.7%22—
R J URMSON COMMISSIONING ENGINEERS LTD22.7%22—
UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN22.7%22—
RESPIREX INTERNATIONAL LTD22.7%22—
RAMBUTAN LTD22.7%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 74 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 62 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 69 of 69 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 23%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£46k middle valuerobust · n=69Middle half £27k–£70k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
DBTH DRI Ortho Minor Ops roomBermar Building Co Ltd—8 mo£267,947 †
DBTH CHP Maintenance MontaguYLEM—4 yrs£216,000
≈ £54k/yr
DBTH 100 x Essenza 200 bedsLINET UK—1 yrs£139,894 †
≈ £140k/yr
DBTH 100 Dynamic Mattress SystemsTALLEY GROUP LTD—1 yrs£129,500 †
≈ £130k/yr
DBTH Clinical Decontamination Units (CDU) 2 operational tents (DRI & Bassetlaw)NATIONWIDE SERVICE COMPANY LTD—1 yrs£102,580 †
≈ £103k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

73 of 73 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 30 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 89 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
DBTH TARN & National Major Trauma Registry (NMTR)Awarded / complete2 Apr 2026—
DBTH Lithoclast system– Urology surgery due to product obsolescence from April 2Awarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
DBTH RIS Zillion Read only support & MaintenanceAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
DBTH St Lukes Hospice, Sheffield ECHO SuperhubAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
DBTH Purchase of x2 Waste Management Systems for Urology TheatresAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
Senior Nurse Leadership & Development ProgrammesAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
Apollo ManikinAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
External HR servicesAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
DBTH Cardiac MRI SoftwareAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
DBTH Paediatric leadership TransformationAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH Independent Paediatric BenchmarkingAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH 6 x Haag Streit Elara 900 Slit LampsAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH 100 x Essenza 200 bedsAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH 100 Dynamic Mattress SystemsAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH Ranger Blood & Fluid Warming SystemsAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH Refurbishment of theatre storeroomAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH PRPS Training Suits (Generation 3)Awarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH PRPS Live Suits (Generation 3)Awarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH CTG transducersAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
DBTH Clinical Decontamination Units (CDU) 2 operational tents (DRI & Bassetlaw)Awarded / complete25 Mar 2026—

Search all 89 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 73 of 73 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.