Government Actuary's Department: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Non-ministerial departmentCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPJVY-9952-JQGRWebsitegov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months16+220% vs prior 12 months (5)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share35%of 17 awarded procedures · 15 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

17 awarded tenders, 15 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months95 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.4mnet · on 18 of 18 published values · top 5 = 66%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(21 notices)
    21 of 21 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award71%(15 notices)
    15 of 21 notices are Direct award (71%).
  • Open14%(3 notices)
    3 of 21 notices are Open (14%).
  • Route not published10%(2 notices)
    2 of 21 notices are Route not published (10%).
  • Limited / restricted5%(1 notice)
    1 of 21 notices is Limited / restricted (5%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 21 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ortec Finance LTD211.8%2212 Mar 2025
Methods Business & Digital Technology Ltd211.8%22—
Towers Watson Ltd211.8%22—
Barnett Waddingham LLP15.9%11—
BUPA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH LIMITED15.9%11—
MHR International UK Limited15.9%11—
EMERALD GROUP LIMITED15.9%11—
MENKUS AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.15.9%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 35% of 17 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 15 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 18 of 18 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 66%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£49k middle valuerobust · n=18Middle half £27k–£85k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Economic Scenario Generator ServiceOrtec Finance LTD—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£345,094 †
≈ £115k/yr
Economic Scenario Generator ServiceBarnett Waddingham LLP—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£290,000 †
≈ £97k/yr
Phase 2 Salesforce improvements- Access integrationMethods Business & Digital Technology Ltd——£115,635 †
Climate Risk DataJBA RISK MANAGEMENT LIMITED—1 yrs£97,688 †
≈ £98k/yr
Star Actuarial Futures - ContractorSTAR ACTUARIAL FUTURES LIMITED—6 mo£89,443 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

15 of 16 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 21 of 21 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
iTrent AgreementAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Recruitment Services - Senior Trainee ActuaryAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
ResQ Enterprise LicensesAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Phase 2 Salesforce improvements- Access integrationSoftware consultancy servicesAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Pensions Valuation SoftwareAnalyticalPlanning17 Aug 2026£1,400,000
Health AssessmentsHealth servicesPlanned7 Aug 2026£150,000
Exco Strategy Health CheckAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Star Actuarial Futures - ContractorAwarded / complete18 Jun 2026—
Climate Risk DataAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Finance and Operations Director Executive SearchAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Bloomberg Terminal & Data LicensesAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Salesforce Health CheckAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Brand & Design WorkAwarded / complete11 Jun 2026—
Occupational Health ServicesAwarded / complete9 Jun 2026—
Economic Scenario Generator Service2 lotsEconomic research servicesAwarded / complete10 Apr 2026£575,000
ResQ Enterprise LicensingAwarded / complete20 Jan 2026—
Economic & Climate Scenario Generator ServiceEconomic research servicesPlanning15 Sept 2025£450,000
Society of Pension Professionals Annual MembershipAwarded / complete2 Jun 2025—
Open Accounts Annual Maintenance RenewalAwarded / complete2 Jun 2025—
Climate Scenario DataAwarded / complete26 Mar 2025—

Search all 21 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 16 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.