Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentEast MidlandsKetteringRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPCPL-4765-VNRNWebsitekgh.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months47-2% vs prior 12 months (48)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot4.516.7% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 88 awarded procedures · 79 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

88 awarded tenders, 79 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months95 within 6 months · 2 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£58mnet · on 62 of 62 published values · top 5 = 82%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 95 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(91 notices)
    91 of 95 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(4 notices)
    4 of 95 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted38%(36 notices)
    36 of 95 notices are Limited / restricted (38%).
  • Direct award26%(25 notices)
    25 of 95 notices are Direct award (26%).
  • Route not published20%(19 notices)
    19 of 95 notices are Route not published (20%).
  • Open12%(11 notices)
    11 of 95 notices are Open (12%).
  • Selective4%(4 notices)
    4 of 95 notices are Selective (4%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5robust · n=616.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

66 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 95 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

011 of 95 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

5.6% below estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 88 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 79 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£58mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 62 of 62 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 82%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£95k middle valuerobust · n=62Middle half £21k–£300k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Urgent Treatment Centre servicesSouth East London Doctor's Cooperative Ltd14 Jul 20254 yrs£14,126,000
≈ £3.5m/yr
Pathology Managed Service for Midlands & East 2 NetworkROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED——£13,000,000 †
Remote Teleradiological Reporting ServicesEverlight Radiology Ltd——£9,500,000 †
Mortuary ServicesWest Northamptonshire Council——£9,000,000 †
Lot 1: Managed Interpretation and Translation Service (No BSL)Word360 Ltd——£2,000,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

32 of 88 contracts carry an end date, 6 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 128 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
KGH-ULTRASOUND BRONCHOSCOPE MAINTENANCEAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026—
NHS Staff Survey and NHS Bank Staff SurveySurvey servicesAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
ENT Outsourcing ServicesHealth servicesOpen11 Sept 2026—
ENT OutsourcingENT or audiologist servicesCancelled11 Sept 2026£3,000,000
Provision of Professional Interpreting and Translation ServicesInterpretation servicesOpen7 Sept 2026£2,000,000
Provision of Friends and Family Test (FFT) Surveys ServiceSurvey servicesAwarded / complete26 Aug 2026£100,000
UHN - Provision of Refurbishment Works to Upgrade an Existing Data CentreRefurbishment workPlanning19 Aug 2026£470,000
Provision of Professional Interpreting and Translation ServicesInterpretation servicesCancelled6 Aug 2026£1,200,000
Provision of Drainage Maintenance ServicesRepair and maintenance servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026£2,400,000
Provision of Building Management System Maintenance ServicesAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
Molecular Pathology specialist testPathology servicesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
UHN Funeral ServicesFuneral servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026£460,000
Specialist send away tests - CambridgePathology servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—
Specialist send away tests - Newcastle upon TynePathology servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—
Specialist send away tests - UHCL KGHPathology servicesAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—
Specialist send away tests - Imperial CollegePathology servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
Specialist send away tests - CambridgePathology servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2026—
Pathology Managed Service for Midlands & East 2 NetworkPathology servicesAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Cancer Software Services - KGHAwarded / complete29 Jun 2026—
Provision of Medical & Non-Medical Job Planning and Medical AppraisalAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—

Search all 128 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 32 of 88 published contracts have an end date; 6 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.