LHC Procurement Group Ltd on behalf of the Welsh Procurement Alliance: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)·Greater London·Uxbridge
Companies House14601330 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bailey Partnership (consultants) LLP | 2 | 100% | 0 | 13 | — |
| Ventro Ltd | 2 | 100% | 0 | 8 | — |
| RIDGE AND PARTNERS LLP | 1 | 50% | 0 | 12 | — |
| Rider Levett Bucknall Ltd | 1 | 50% | 0 | 9 | — |
| Taylor Lewis Ltd | 1 | 50% | 0 | 8 | — |
| Faithful+Gould | 1 | 50% | 0 | 7 | — |
| Watts Group Limited | 1 | 50% | 0 | 7 | — |
| Global HSE Solutions Limited | 1 | 50% | 0 | 7 | — |
2 awarded procedures across 107 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
11 of 31 contracts carry an end date, 11 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
Soonest 10 of 11 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 2 of 2 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fire Safety FrameworkBuilding consultancy services | Awarded / complete | 2 Apr 2024 | £15,000,000 |
| Consultancy Services FrameworkArchitectural and related services | Awarded / complete | 26 Apr 2023 | £10,000,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 11 of 31 published contracts have an end date; 11 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.