NHS THAMES VALLEY INTEGRATED CARE BOARD: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPCentral governmentSouth East EnglandOxford

Official UK PPONPTYM-1261-MZLN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months280 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share32%of 25 awarded procedures · 20 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

25 awarded tenders, 20 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months22 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£58mnet · on 25 of 25 published values · top 5 = 70%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 28 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(28 notices)
    28 of 28 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted79%(22 notices)
    22 of 28 notices are Limited / restricted (79%).
  • Direct award11%(3 notices)
    3 of 28 notices are Direct award (11%).
  • Open7%(2 notices)
    2 of 28 notices are Open (7%).
  • Route not published4%(1 notice)
    1 of 28 notices is Route not published (4%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 28 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 28 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 32% of 25 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 20 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£58mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 25 of 25 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 70%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£760k middle valuerobust · n=25Middle half £211k–£3.0m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
APMS GP Services Cressex Health CentreBetter Health Bucks C.I.C——£12,655,480 †
GP IT and Corporate IT Support for NHS Thames Valley Integrated Care BoardTRUSTED TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP LTD—2 yrs£9,350,000
≈ £4.7m/yr
Slough Primary Care ServicesEast Berkshire Primary Care——£8,107,876 †
Out of Hours (OOH) Service (East Berkshire area)East Berkshire Primary Care——£5,527,771 †
Bracknell Urgent Care CentreOne Medical Group Ltd——£5,042,692 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

2 of 24 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 28 of 28 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Children's Commissioning SupportAwarded / complete23 Oct 2026—
Children and Young People's Specialist Palliative and End of Life Care ServiceCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Women's Health Hub for Berkshire West (Reading, Wokingham and West Berkshire)Community health servicesAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
GP IT and Corporate IT Support for NHS Thames Valley Integrated Care BoardAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
First Aid Unit Chipping NortonHealth servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Community Ophthalmology Triage ServiceOphthalmologist servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Community Ophthalmology Eye Casualty ServiceOphthalmologist servicesAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
Autism and ADHD adviceMiscellaneous health servicesAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
Out of Hours (OOH) Service (East Berkshire area)Health servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Banbury Urgent Treatment CentreHealth servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Reading Urgent Care CentreHealth servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Slough Primary Care ServicesHealth servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Same Day Service (RBWM)Health servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Local CAS & ED Revalidation ServiceHealth servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Bracknell Urgent Care CentreHealth servicesAwarded / complete30 Sept 2026—
Further Competition for Neighbourhood and Partnership Development Support PartnerBusiness and management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete16 Sept 2026—
APMS GP Services Cressex Health CentreGeneral-practitioner servicesAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Pre- and Post-Diagnostics Service for Adults with AutismPsychiatrist or psychologist servicesAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Community Ophthalmology ServiceOphthalmologist servicesAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Community OphthalmologyOphthalmologist servicesAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—

Search all 28 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 2 of 24 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.