OAK NATIONAL ACADEMY LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)·GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public body·Central government·North West England·Manchester
Companies House14174888 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
24 awarded tenders, 43 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
72 IT services: consulting, software, internet2 procedures · 13%80 Education and training services2 procedures · 13%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting1 procedures · 6%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 16 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract94%(15 notices)
15 of 16 notices are Contract (94%).Dynamic purchasing system6%(1 notices)
1 of 16 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (6%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Direct award31%(5 notices)
5 of 16 notices are Direct award (31%).Limited / restricted19%(3 notices)
3 of 16 notices are Limited / restricted (19%).Open19%(3 notices)
3 of 16 notices are Open (19%).Route not published19%(3 notices)
3 of 16 notices are Route not published (19%).Selective13%(2 notices)
2 of 16 notices are Selective (13%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 16 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMPUTER CONQUEST LIMITED | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 2 | — |
| VE3 Global Ltd | 2 | 8.3% | 2 | 2 | 11 Nov 2025 |
| VGML LTD | 2 | 8.3% | 1 | 2 | 11 Nov 2025 |
| Moorefield Initiatives | 2 | 8.3% | 1 | 2 | — |
| Nexer Digital | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 2 | 11 Nov 2025 |
| RED BADGER CONSULTING LIMITED | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 2 | 11 Nov 2025 |
| CURSOR LIMITED | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 1 | 11 Nov 2025 |
| CHATRESH CONSULTANTS LIMITED | 1 | 4.2% | 1 | 1 | 11 Nov 2025 |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 24 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 43 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reception Year of EYFS | Study Mind | 24 Jul 2026 | 11 mo · up to 2.9 yrs | £383,542 |
| Alpha Digital Product Software Engineering Services | UMBEL WORKS LTD | — | 6 mo | £74,865 † |
| Dual-language Captioning of MFL Video Lessons | Happy Scribe Limited | — | 6 mo · up to 1.1 yrs | £66,666 † |
| Internal Curriculum SDK Software Engineering Services | COMPUTER CONQUEST LIMITED | — | 4 mo | £64,000 † |
| STUDIO BUILD | ROSS MACKAY CONSULTING LTD | — | 6 mo | £62,500 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
29 of 38 contracts carry an end date, 17 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curriculum Data Migration Software Engineering Services | COMPUTER CONQUEST LIMITED | 30 Nov 2026 | £56,000 |
| Internal Curriculum SDK Software Engineering Services | COMPUTER CONQUEST LIMITED | 30 Nov 2026 | £64,000 |
| Alpha Digital Product Software Engineering Services | UMBEL WORKS LTD | 28 Feb 2027 | £74,865 |
| STUDIO BUILD | ROSS MACKAY CONSULTING LTD | 31 Mar 2027 | £62,500 |
Recent procedures
Latest 28 of 28 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Product Development and Support ServicesIT services: consulting | Awarded / complete | 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| 2026 ATS & HRISRecruitment services | Planning | 8 Oct 2026 | — |
| STUDIO BUILD | Awarded / complete | 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Alpha Digital Product Software Engineering Services | Awarded / complete | 17 Aug 2026 | — |
| Internal Curriculum SDK Software Engineering Services | Awarded / complete | 13 Aug 2026 | — |
| Curriculum Data Migration Software Engineering Services | Awarded / complete | 13 Aug 2026 | — |
| Procurement of Full Curriculum Packages for Reception Year of Early Years Foundation StagePrimary education services | Awarded / complete | 31 Jul 2026 | £575,000 |
| Procurement of partners to work with Oak to further develop and enhance full curriculum packagesPrimary education services | Planned | 7 Jul 2026 | — |
| Accessibility Audit for Oak National Academy | Awarded / complete | 24 Feb 2026 | — |
| Internal Curriculum Authoring Tool | Awarded / complete | 17 Dec 2025 | — |
| Learn Squad Engineer - Google Classroom Add-on | Awarded / complete | 27 Nov 2025 | — |
| Digital Asset Management | Awarded / complete | 16 Jun 2025 | — |
| BSL Video Translation Services | Awarded / complete | 16 Jun 2025 | — |
| Teacher Surveys | Awarded / complete | 16 Jun 2025 | — |
| GraphQL API hosting | Awarded / complete | 13 May 2025 | — |
| Dual-language Captioning of MFL Video Lessons | Awarded / complete | 8 May 2025 | — |
| Oak National Academy Cycle 2 Specification for Full Curriculum Packages 2023/2024Education and training services | Awarded / complete | 12 Apr 2024 | £6,001,334 |
| Materials for School SupportEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 12 Apr 2024 | — |
| External SupportEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 12 Apr 2024 | — |
| KS4 Geography Curriculum DevelopmentEducation and training services | Awarded / complete | 12 Apr 2024 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 29 of 38 published contracts have an end date; 17 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.