Plus Dane Housing Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyNorth West EnglandLiverpool

Official UK PPONPXQM-5863-RTMN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months19+73% vs prior 12 months (11)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share13%of 24 awarded procedures · 24 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

24 awarded tenders, 24 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months92 within 6 months · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.7mnet · on 3 of 3 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 30 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(30 notices)
    30 of 30 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted47%(14 notices)
    14 of 30 notices are Limited / restricted (47%).
  • Route not published30%(9 notices)
    9 of 30 notices are Route not published (30%).
  • Direct award10%(3 notices)
    3 of 30 notices are Direct award (10%).
  • Open10%(3 notices)
    3 of 30 notices are Open (10%).
  • Selective3%(1 notice)
    1 of 30 notices is Selective (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 30 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 30 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
ICE Creates Ltd14.2%11—
iKon Training Limited14.2%11—
David Tolson Partnership Limited14.2%11—
CALICO ENTERPRISE LIMITED14.2%11—
Pocket Power14.2%11—
Unite Procurement Ltd14.2%11—
Next Energy Solutions14.2%116 Aug 2026
Krol Corlett Construction Limited14.2%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 13% of 24 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 24 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.7mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 3 of 3 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 18 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£161k middle valuemoderate · n=3Middle half £145k–£771k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Insurance services contract extensionUnite Procurement Ltd——£1,381,180 †
Grange Terrace - Property ConversionKrol Corlett Construction Limited—2 mo · up to 0.3 yrs£160,935 †
Customer Research (Perception Surveys)Acuity Research and Practice Limited——£130,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

23 of 25 contracts carry an end date, 5 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 43 of 43 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Customer Household Bills Support ServiceAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Qlik SaaS LicensingAwarded / complete21 Oct 2026—
Financial Business Planning & Stress Testing SupportAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Health Cash Plan ServicesAwarded / complete15 Oct 2026—
Energy Brokerage ServicesAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
Energy Efficiency Retrofit WorksAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
GSHP system design at Arclid Court, CongletonAwarded / complete3 Aug 2026—
Customer Experience TrainingAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Professional Boundaries and Conflict Resolution TrainingAwarded / complete3 Jun 2026—
Design and Delivery of a Programme for Plus Dane’s Leadership Team (Directors and Executive Directors)Business and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete21 Apr 2026£35,000
Transactional Satisfaction Survey PlatformAwarded / complete9 Apr 2026—
Provision of Occupational Health ServiceCompany health servicesAwarded / complete9 Apr 2026£150,000
E-Tendering SystemAwarded / complete7 Apr 2026—
Samsung KnoxAwarded / complete20 Mar 2026—
Leadership Development ProgrammeAwarded / complete25 Feb 2026—
Universal Credit Verification & Direct Debit Uplift Robotic Process AutomationAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Ordnance Survey and HMLR Geospatial DatasetsAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
Preliminary Market Engagement - Electronic Payment ServicesFinancial and insurance servicesPlanning26 Jan 2026£0
Non-Executive Director (NED) Recruitment SupportAwarded / complete17 Nov 2025—
Grange Terrace - Property ConversionAwarded / complete13 Nov 2025—

Search all 43 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 23 of 25 published contracts have an end date; 5 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.