South Ribble Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityNorth West EnglandLeyland

Official UK PPONPHRY-1373-GMVN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months14+75% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share42%of 12 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

12 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months21 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£757knet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 22 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract95%(21 notices)
    21 of 22 notices are Contract (95%).
  • Framework5%(1 notice)
    1 of 22 notices is Framework (5%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open68%(15 notices)
    15 of 22 notices are Open (68%).
  • Limited / restricted18%(4 notices)
    4 of 22 notices are Limited / restricted (18%).
  • Route not published14%(3 notices)
    3 of 22 notices are Route not published (14%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

14indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

49 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 23 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 23 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Preston Care and Repair Ltd216.7%237 Sept 2026
Redline Travel Ltd216.7%22—
Cunard Construction Ltd18.3%11—
Teal Furniture Limited18.3%11—
CallCare Ltd18.3%11—
Ground Inc Ltd18.3%11—
Landscape Engineering Ltd18.3%11—
Prescott Special Projects Ltd18.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 42% of 12 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£757kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£166k middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £115k–£187k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Withy Grove Park and Car Park ImprovementsPrescott Special Projects Ltd—1 mo£239,508 †
Invitation to Tender for Refurbishment & Asbestos Removal at Units 4 Middleforth Industrial Unit, Leyland Road, Penwortham, Preston PR1 9QDCunard Construction Ltd—2 mo£186,698 †
Paradise Park Path ad Park ImprovementsGround Inc Ltd—1 mo£165,840 †
South Ribble School Swimming transport 26-27Redline Travel Ltd—11 mo£115,000 †
Fossdale Moss New Multi-Use Track, LeylandLandscape Engineering Ltd—1 mo£50,400 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

11 of 18 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Temporary Call Handling ServicesCallCare Ltd31 Mar 2027£63,375
South Ribble School Swimming transport 26-27Redline Travel Ltd31 Jul 2027£115,000

Recent procedures

Latest 25 of 25 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
School Swimming Transport ServicesHire of passenger transport vehicles with driverOpen18 Feb 2025£360,000
Invitation to Tender for Building Statutory Compliance Works, Planned and Reactive Maintenance, and Minor Works FrameworkFramework13 lotsAir-conditioning installation workOpen19 Nov 2024£22,500,000
To supply the Content Management System for South Ribble and Chorley Council's website and sub sites.IT services: consultingAwarded / complete3 Apr 2024—
ITT FOR THE PROVISION OF A LEAD DESIGN CONSULTANT - PENWORTHAM MASTERPLAN (RIBA STAGE 3-4)Construction consultancy servicesOpen12 Sept 2023—
FURTHER COMPETITION TENDER UNDER DPS 00978 FOR THE PROVISION OF INSURANCE PLACEMENTDPS18 lotsFinancial and insurance servicesAwarded / complete13 Jan 2022—

Search all 25 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 11 of 18 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.