Sovereign Network Group: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Registered Society·Social housing register: Registered society·Nationwide (UK)·Basingstoke
Companies HouseRS007448 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
45 Construction work10 procedures · 33%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting7 procedures · 23%71 Architectural, construction, engineering6 procedures · 20%90 Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental4 procedures · 13%34 Transport equipment and products2 procedures · 7%35 Security, fire-fighting, police2 procedures · 7%30 Office and computing machinery1 procedure · 3%39 Furniture, furnishings, domestic appliances1 procedure · 3%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 30 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract73%(22 notices)
22 of 30 notices are Contract (73%).Framework27%(8 notices)
8 of 30 notices are Framework (27%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Route not published60%(18 notices)
18 of 30 notices are Route not published (60%).Direct award13%(4 notices)
4 of 30 notices are Direct award (13%).Open13%(4 notices)
4 of 30 notices are Open (13%).Selective13%(4 notices)
4 of 30 notices are Selective (13%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 30 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HICKTON QUALITY CONTROL LTD | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| SILVER DCC LIMITED | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Fulkers Bailey Russell | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Potter Raper Ltd | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Airey Miller | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Martin Arnold Limited | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Keegans Ltd | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
| Calfordseaden LLP | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 2 | 1 Oct 2026 |
9 awarded procedures across 48 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNG Office Furniture Contract | Kerr Office Group Ltd | 26 Sept 2025 | 3 yrs · up to 6 yrs | £1,980,000 ≈ £660k/yr |
| Flexible benefits platform Darwin | Mercer | 18 Sept 2026 | 3 yrs | £466,680 ≈ £156k/yr |
| Credit Rating and Analytical Services | S&P Global Ratings UK Limited | 15 Oct 2025 | 4 mo | £190,000 |
Recent procedures
Latest 30 of 30 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical StructureElectrical services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £8,000,000 |
| External AuditAuditing services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £3,864,000 |
| Maintenance Contract for Asbestos Surveys & TestingAsbestos removal services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £5,000,000 |
| Workwear and PPEProtective and safety clothing | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £2,160,000 |
| Water Hygiene Services ContractHygiene services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £2,400,000 |
| Communal and Window CleaningBuilding-cleaning services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £25,000,000 |
| Waste managementWaste and rubbish containers and bins | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £4,500,000 |
| FoH Reception ServicesReception services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £0 |
| Maintenance of Passenger and Domestic LiftsLift-maintenance services | Planned | 20 May 2025 | £9,000,000 |
| Contractor framework for new build, refurbishment projects and construction management servicesConstruction management services | Planned | 29 Oct 2024 | £750,000,000 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 4 of 4 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.