Sport England: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyOther public bodyEast MidlandsLoughborough

Official UK PPONPTWR-9348-TXMN

Open now1next deadline 16 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months19+171% vs prior 12 months (7)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot233.3% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share21%of 53 awarded procedures · 87 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

53 awarded tenders, 87 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months73 within 6 months · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£32mnet · on 16 of 16 published values · top 5 = 98%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
SE1286 Transgender Inclusion in Domestic Sports Guidance Review16 Nov 202622d£96,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 26 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract85%(22 notices)
    22 of 26 notices are Contract (85%).
  • Framework15%(4 notices)
    4 of 26 notices are Framework (15%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award69%(18 notices)
    18 of 26 notices are Direct award (69%).
  • Open23%(6 notices)
    6 of 26 notices are Open (23%).
  • Selective8%(2 notices)
    2 of 26 notices are Selective (8%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2moderate · n=333.3% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

24 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 26 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 26 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Continuum Sport & Leisureframework/DPS on 2611.3%3828 Sept 2026
IPSOS (MARKET RESEARCH) LTD47.5%2416 Mar 2026
Strategic Leisure Limitedframework/DPS on 235.7%3513 Oct 2026
Wavemaker Ltd35.7%331 Oct 2026
Oracle Corporation UK Limited35.7%2425 Aug 2026
Substance 2005 Ltd35.7%1426 Mar 2026
Knight, Kavanagh & Pageframework/DPS on 223.8%2424 Sept 2025
Max Associates (Holdings) LTDframework/DPS on 223.8%2424 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 53 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 87 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£32mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 16 of 16 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 98%; a further 5 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£89k middle valuerobust · n=16Middle half £29k–£977k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
SE1249 - TGC Media Buying ServicesWavemaker Ltd26 Mar 20262.3 yrs£12,331,686
≈ £5.3m/yr
SE1249 - TGC Media Buying AgencyWavemaker Ltd—2.3 yrs£12,331,686
≈ £5.3m/yr
SE1181-Moving Communities Facilities & Place Data Platform, Performance Management and Improvement Framework & Third-Party Services4Global Consulting Ltd——£3,568,400 †
SE1180 Active Lives CYPIPSOS (MARKET RESEARCH) LTD——£3,000,000 †
SE1211 Finance System RenewalOracle Corporation UK Limited—1 yrs£302,408
≈ £302k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

30 of 66 contracts carry an end date, 11 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 67 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
SE1284 Sport StructuresAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
SE1255 Active Environments Strategic Outcome Planning GuidanceAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
SE1282 - TGC EconometricsAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
SE1278 - Martyn's Law and Good Security Practice Guidance for Community Sports ClubsAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
SE1271 NetsuiteAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
SE1251 Active Lives adult small area estimates 2024-25Awarded / complete31 Jul 2026—
SE1222 - Code Evaluation ProjectAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
SE1261 - Active Lives Statistical AssuranceAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
SE1264 - This Girl Can - Place Pilots EvaluationAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
SE1249 - TGC Media Buying AgencyAwarded / complete23 Apr 2026—
SE1249 - TGC Media Buying AgencyAwarded / complete26 Mar 2026—
SE1246 Organisational Narrative DevelopmentAwarded / complete25 Mar 2026—
SE1239 TASS Regional Coaching HubAwarded / complete25 Mar 2026—
SE1254 NLA LicenceAwarded / complete25 Mar 2026—
SE1197 Active Lives Online ToolAwarded / complete27 Feb 2026—
SE1243 Legal Counsel Blackstone ChambersAwarded / complete16 Feb 2026—
SE1190 EDI Consultancy Support ProgrammeFramework3 lotsBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete16 Feb 2026£350,000
SE1184 Active Environments Framework LOT CFramework3 lotsDevelopment consultancy servicesAwarded / complete8 Dec 2025£5,400,000
SE1184 Active Environments Framework Market EngagementFrameworkDesignsAwarded / complete8 Dec 2025£4,500,000
Special Advisory Consultancy SE1224Awarded / complete27 Nov 2025—

Search all 67 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 30 of 66 published contracts have an end date; 11 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.