Staffordshire Moorlands District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityWest MidlandsLeek,

Official UK PPONPYBH-3474-MGYY

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months14+75% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share44%of 18 awarded procedures · 13 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

18 awarded tenders, 13 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months31 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£926knet · on 16 of 16 published values · top 5 = 52%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 22 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(22 notices)
    22 of 22 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award73%(16 notices)
    16 of 22 notices are Direct award (73%).
  • Open23%(5 notices)
    5 of 22 notices are Open (23%).
  • Route not published5%(1 notice)
    1 of 22 notices is Route not published (5%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 22 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 22 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 44% of 18 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 13 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£926kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 16 of 16 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 52%; a further 2 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£47k middle valuerobust · n=16Middle half £36k–£82k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Integrated Business & Software solutionsIntegrated Business Software and Solutions Limited—2.8 yrs£110,390 †
≈ £39k/yr
PROC-6363 Design and Installation of Two Pump TracksClark & Kent Contractors—4 mo£109,900 †
P6298Availe Digital—8 mo£93,750 †
PROC-6391 Rough Sleeper Supported AccommodationFramework Housing Association—1 yrs · up to 3 yrs£87,216 †
≈ £87k/yr
PROC-6433 CCTV Line RentalSPITFIRE NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED—3 yrs£80,693 †
≈ £27k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

18 of 18 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 24 of 24 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Leek Arts & Crafts MarketsFair and exhibition organisation servicesPlanning16 Oct 2026£1,500
P6422 Integrated Business & Software SolutionsAwarded / complete29 Jun 2026—
PROC-6348 Rationalisation of Industrial Units BiddulphArchitecturalAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026£25,000
PROC-6433 CCTV Line RentalAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
PROC-6391 Rough Sleeper Supported AccommodationAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
PROC-6363 Design and Installation of Two Pump TracksInstallation services (except software)Awarded / complete26 Jun 2026£130,000
Integrated Business & Software solutionsAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
P6291 Consultation SoftwareAwarded / complete6 Feb 2026—
P6298Awarded / complete6 Feb 2026—
P6373 Defibrillator Maintenance ServicesAwarded / complete6 Feb 2026—
PROC-6341 Temporary Agency StaffAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
P6346 Masterplan Cattle market and Cornhill EastResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesOpen17 Dec 2025£30,000
P6167 Interim Principle OfficerAwarded / complete15 Dec 2025—
Volunteering For AllAwarded / complete2 Dec 2025—
P6221 Mural RestorationAwarded / complete2 Dec 2025—
Agency Member of StaffAwarded / complete2 Dec 2025—
P6229 Interim OfficerAwarded / complete2 Oct 2025—
P6226 Temporary StaffAwarded / complete2 Oct 2025—
P6296 Interim OfficerAwarded / complete2 Oct 2025—
P6301 Planning Applications Ecology SupportAwarded / complete2 Oct 2025—

Search all 24 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 18 of 18 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.