Stratfield Mortimer Parish Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Local authoritySouth East EnglandMortimer, Reading

Official UK PPONPDCD-1195-YZYWWebsitestratfield-mortimer.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months30 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£459knet · on 4 of 4 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 3 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(3 notices)
    3 of 3 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Route not published67%(2 notices)
    2 of 3 notices are Route not published (67%).
  • Limited / restricted33%(1 notices)
    1 of 3 notices are Limited / restricted (33%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 3 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 3 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
RC SAUNDERS LIMITED266.7%2321 May 2026
White Horse Contractors Limited133.3%11—

3 awarded procedures across 2 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£459kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 4 of 4 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£89k middle valuemoderate · n=4Middle half £68k–£136k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Footpath between Mortimer and Burghfield CommonRC SAUNDERS LIMITED16 Jan 20262 mo£248,486
Stratfield Mortimer Parish Council Cemetery ExtensionWhite Horse Contractors Limited—1.3 yrs£98,274 †
≈ £79k/yr
Phase C of Mortimer to Burghfield CyclewayRC SAUNDERS LIMITED—4 mo£80,067 †
Fairground Fence ReplacementRC SAUNDERS LIMITED—5 mo£32,075 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

4 of 4 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Phase C of cyclewayRC SAUNDERS LIMITED31 Dec 2026£80,067

Recent procedures

Latest 3 of 3 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Phase C of Mortimer to Burghfield CyclewayAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
Fairground Fence ReplacementAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—
Stratfield Mortimer Parish Council Cemetery ExtensionAwarded / complete29 Sept 2026—

Search all 3 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 4 of 4 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.