The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentWest MidlandsDudley

Official UK PPONPRGP-5218-PVYDWebsitedgft.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months5-67% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share25%of 16 awarded procedures · 16 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

16 awarded tenders, 16 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£11mnet · on 15 of 15 published values · top 5 = 95%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 20 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(20 notices)
    20 of 20 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted65%(13 notices)
    13 of 20 notices are Limited / restricted (65%).
  • Direct award15%(3 notices)
    3 of 20 notices are Direct award (15%).
  • Open15%(3 notices)
    3 of 20 notices are Open (15%).
  • Route not published5%(1 notices)
    1 of 20 notices are Route not published (5%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 20 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 20 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS trust212.5%22—
InHealth Ltd16.3%11—
Plan B Solutions Ltd16.3%115 Mar 2026
JG Support Services Ltd16.3%11—
Sae Healthcare Ltd16.3%11—
Eaglelion Services16.3%11—
Inspired Healthcare Consultancy Ltd16.3%11—
Watpharm Limited16.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 25% of 16 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 16 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£11mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 15 of 15 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 95%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£88k middle valuerobust · n=15Middle half £35k–£137k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
DGFT-Kidderminster Satellite dialysisWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust——£8,962,030 †
Provision of In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation servicesSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS trust——£684,000 †
Provision of In-patient Stroke Rehabilitation servicesSandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS trust——£460,000 †
Hospital Workplace Utilisation Studies – Corbett and Guest SitesPlan B Solutions Ltd—1 mo£164,446
DGFT -NHS Continuing Healthcare AssessmentsWatpharm Limited——£110,000 †

Recent procedures

Latest 23 of 23 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Medical Physics ServicesMedical imaging servicesPlanned6 Jun 2024£300,000
Local Security Management Specialist ServicesSecurity servicesOpen5 Feb 2024£30,000
Modern Clinical Communications Solution and Implementation PartnerCommunication software packageOpen14 Jun 2023£350,000

Search all 23 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 0 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.