The Housing Plus Group Limited: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Registered SocietySocial housing register: Registered societyWest MidlandsStafford

Registry IDGB-MPR-30224RWebsitehousingplusgroup.co.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months20% vs prior 12 months (2)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot160% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Published award value, 24m£120knet · on 1 of 1 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 4 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(4 notices)
    4 of 4 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Selective50%(2 notices)
    2 of 4 notices are Selective (50%).
  • Limited / restricted25%(1 notice)
    1 of 4 notices is Limited / restricted (25%).
  • Route not published25%(1 notice)
    1 of 4 notices is Route not published (25%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

16robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 4 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 4 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
4 RECRUITMENT SERVICES LTD133.3%1315 Apr 2026
AMETRINE CARE SERVICES LTD133.3%1315 Apr 2026
Sellick Partnership Limited133.3%1315 Apr 2026
SAFEHANDS RECRUITMENT LTD133.3%1215 Apr 2026
Axis Recruitment Limited133.3%1215 Apr 2026
Service Care Solutions Limited133.3%1215 Apr 2026
Red Snapper Recruitment Limited133.3%1215 Apr 2026
Community Resourcing Limited t/a Resourcing Group133.3%1215 Apr 2026

3 awarded procedures across 22 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£120kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 1 of 1 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Fleet TelematicsQuartix Ltd—5 yrs£120,166 †
≈ £24k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 5 of 5 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Fleet TelematicsAwarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Tender for the provision of Recruitment Agency Preferred Supplier List (PSL)5 lotsRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026£1,925,000
Fleet VehiclesFlatbed and Tipper trucksPlanned27 May 2025£6,000,000
Building MaterialsBuilding materialsPlanned27 May 2025£50,000,000
Residential development, Wrottesley Park Road, PertonConstruction workAwarded / complete3 May 2022—

Search all 5 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 6 of 7 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.