The Police and Crime Commissioner for Cambridgeshire: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Police & fireEast of EnglandHuntingdon

Official UK PPONPYNN-7542-TPNQWebsiteatamis-7459.my.site.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months43+258% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot3.516.7% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share24%of 46 awarded procedures · 41 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

46 awarded tenders, 41 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months84 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£11mnet · on 46 of 46 published values · top 5 = 78%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 55 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract98%(54 notices)
    54 of 55 notices are Contract (98%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(1 notice)
    1 of 55 notices is Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted38%(21 notices)
    21 of 55 notices are Limited / restricted (38%).
  • Direct award35%(19 notices)
    19 of 55 notices are Direct award (35%).
  • Open18%(10 notices)
    10 of 55 notices are Open (18%).
  • Route not published9%(5 notices)
    5 of 55 notices are Route not published (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3.5robust · n=616.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

48 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 55 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

08 of 55 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

25.4% above estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Specialist Computer Centres Plc510.9%55—
Softcat Plc36.5%33—
Eddisons Commercial Limited36.5%33—
CDW Limited36.5%33—
Red Snapper Managed Services Limited24.3%237 Jul 2026
Computacenter24.3%22—
Anglia Ruskin University24.3%22—
Peterborough Womens Aid12.2%1227 Nov 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 24% of 46 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 41 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£11mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 46 of 46 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 78%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£40k middle valuerobust · n=46Middle half £20k–£108k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Sexual Violence Support Service for Cambridgeshire and PeterboroughCambridge Rape Crisis Centre—1.8 yrs · up to 4.8 yrs£4,882,544 †
≈ £2.8m/yr
DRIVE Project for Cambridgeshire and PeterboroughRed Snapper Managed Services Limited—2 yrs · up to 4.7 yrs£1,129,075 †
≈ £565k/yr
DRIVE Project for Cambridgeshire and PeterboroughRed Snapper Managed Services Limited6 Jul 20262 yrs · up to 4.8 yrs£1,129,075
≈ £565k/yr
Specialist Domestic Abuse Support Service - Medium RiskPeterborough Womens Aid—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£737,927 †
≈ £246k/yr
FootwearALT BERG LIMITED19 Mar 20262.9 yrs · up to 4.9 yrs£656,000
≈ £225k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

43 of 43 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 55 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Asset ValuationsAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Asset ValuationsAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Asset ValuationsAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
LNA 37AudioCodes SBC: Essentials & ConfigurationAwarded / complete16 Oct 2026—
Youth Mentoring and Diversion ProgrammeAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
AI Call analysisAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Child Focused Court Independent Domestic Violence Adviser (IDVA) Support Service within the county’s Family Courts.Social servicesOpen23 Sept 2026£647,837
Dell R570Awarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
CAMBS 8x Dell Pro Max 16 MC16250 laptop (SR00593542)Awarded / complete8 Sept 2026—
CAMBS 22x Dell Pro 16 PC16250 (SR00573993)Awarded / complete8 Sept 2026—
DRIVE Project for Cambridgeshire and PeterboroughCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026£1,343,833
Electrical Generator Maintenance Services2 lotsRepair and maintenance services of generatorsAwarded / complete28 Aug 2026£200,000
3 years warranty extensions for Pro-support NBD with keep hard disksAwarded / complete13 Aug 2026—
Sexual Violence Support Service for Cambridgeshire and PeterboroughCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026£4,908,677
Domestic Abuse Early Intervention ProgrammeCounselling servicesOpen17 Jul 2026£160,000
Gym TreadmillsAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Parkside to Milton relocationsAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
Traka SystemAwarded / complete24 Jun 2026—
Out of court disposal systemDPSLegal advisory servicesPlanning23 Jun 2026—
Evidential Breath Alcohol InstrumentsAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—

Search all 55 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 43 of 43 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.