The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentWest MidlandsOswestryRan 2 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPGDP-4875-NVDHWebsiterjah.nhs.uk ↗

Open now2next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months11+10% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Contracts ending ≤18 months32 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.0mnet · on 9 of 9 published values · top 5 = 88%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

2 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Prone Face Cushions30 Oct 20264d£48,803
Prone Face Cushions30 Oct 20264d£48,803

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 21 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(21 notices)
    21 of 21 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open71%(15 notices)
    15 of 21 notices are Open (71%).
  • Limited / restricted24%(5 notices)
    5 of 21 notices are Limited / restricted (24%).
  • Direct award5%(1 notices)
    1 of 21 notices are Direct award (5%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 21 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 21 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
BRACE ORTHOPAEDIC111.1%11—
SPORTSMED PRODUCTS LTD111.1%11—
Anatomical Concepts UK Ltd111.1%11—
Beagle Orhopeadic111.1%11—
Allard Support UK Ltd111.1%11—
A.Algeo Ltd.111.1%11—
KCI Medical111.1%11—
DACEY LTD111.1%11—

9 awarded procedures across 9 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 9 of 9 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 88%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£81k middle valuerobust · n=9Middle half £41k–£99k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Orthopaedic Insourcing ServicePortland Clinical——£520,000 †
OrthoticsA.Algeo Ltd.—3 yrs£112,000 †
≈ £37k/yr
Orthotic Contracting WorkBeagle Orhopeadic—2 yrs£98,969 †
≈ £49k/yr
Orthotic ServicesBRACE ORTHOPAEDIC—4 mo · up to 1.3 yrs£85,899 †
Orthotic ConsumablesAllard Support UK Ltd—1 yrs£80,802 †
≈ £81k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

8 of 9 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 23 of 21 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
TEST DO NOT REPLYprocuring entityPatient-administration systemOpen7 Apr 2025£0

Search all 21 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 8 of 9 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.