The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberRotherham

Official UK PPONPWVB-6553-QVYVWebsitetherotherhamft.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months14-26% vs prior 12 months (19)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot325% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share34%of 29 awarded procedures · 22 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

29 awarded tenders, 22 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months63 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£9.8mnet · on 24 of 24 published values · top 5 = 85%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 33 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(33 notices)
    33 of 33 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award64%(21 notices)
    21 of 33 notices are Direct award (64%).
  • Open15%(5 notices)
    5 of 33 notices are Open (15%).
  • Route not published12%(4 notices)
    4 of 33 notices are Route not published (12%).
  • Limited / restricted9%(3 notices)
    3 of 33 notices are Limited / restricted (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

19 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 33 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 33 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

54.5% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership620.7%66—
Ayre Event Solutions26.9%22—
Monmouth Partners26.9%133 Oct 2025
TABS FM LIMITED13.4%132 Apr 2026
Kyocera Document Solutions (UK) Limited13.4%1131 Mar 2026
BPU Care Ltd13.4%11—
MEDITECH UK13.4%1110 Mar 2026
SH:2413.4%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 34% of 29 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 22 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£9.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 24 of 24 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 85%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£51k middle valuerobust · n=24Middle half £17k–£253k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
EPR SystemMEDITECH UK10 Mar 20262 yrs · up to 4 yrs£2,800,000
≈ £1.4m/yr
Community Unit with Nursing (24 beds)Athorpe Health Care Limited——£1,920,672 †
Managed print serviceKyocera Document Solutions (UK) Limited31 Mar 20265 yrs · up to 9 yrs£1,433,577
≈ £287k/yr
Community Unit with Nursing (24 beds)BPU Care Ltd——£1,311,360 †
Medical Erostering Software SolutionHealthRota Limited12 Oct 20263 yrs · up to 6 yrs£837,937
≈ £279k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

24 of 26 contracts carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 39 of 39 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
NAC LicenseAwarded / complete13 Oct 2026—
Medical Erostering Software SolutionMedical software packageAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026£930,000
Procurement of a Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) SystemComputer facilities management servicesAwarded / complete11 Aug 2026£846,000
TRFT - Location Asset management/ Smart hospitalAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—
Microsoft Office 2024 Pro Plus licencesAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
Pre-Market Engagement - Outsourced Clinical Coding ServicesTechnical analysis or consultancy servicesPlanning9 Jun 2026£120,000
Facilitator of Payments to Agency Doctors StatusAwarded / complete4 Jun 2026—
Managed Print ServicePhotocopying equipmentAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026£3,150,000
Community Unit with Nursing (24 beds)Residential nursing care servicesAwarded / complete29 Mar 2026—
EPR SystemAwarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
TRFT - Nova Biomedical KetoneAwarded / complete9 Mar 2026—
ABANDONED - Community Unit with NursingMiscellaneous health servicesOpen20 Feb 2026£2,700,000
Block of Hours for Tenant MigrationAwarded / complete19 Jan 2026—
STI Testing & Emergency ContraceptionAwarded / complete5 Nov 2025—
Remote Clinical Coding Outsourced ProvisionTechnical analysis or consultancy servicesAwarded / complete28 Oct 2025£680,000
QICN MembershipAwarded / complete22 Oct 2025—
Personal Child Health RecordsAwarded / complete22 Oct 2025—
Recruitment of Non-Executive DirectorsAwarded / complete14 Oct 2025—
Phase 2 of migration to national TennentAwarded / complete23 Jun 2025—
Community Unit with NursingResidential nursing care servicesPlanned21 May 2025£3,000,000

Search all 39 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 24 of 26 published contracts have an end date; 1 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.