University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentEast MidlandsLeicester

Official UK PPONPWXN-8614-MPHHWebsiteleicestershospitals.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months92+300% vs prior 12 months (23)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 111 awarded procedures · 82 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

111 awarded tenders, 82 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3122 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£51mnet · on 79 of 79 published values · top 5 = 89%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 115 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(111 notices)
    111 of 115 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(2 notices)
    2 of 115 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
  • Framework2%(2 notices)
    2 of 115 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award54%(62 notices)
    62 of 115 notices are Direct award (54%).
  • Limited / restricted30%(35 notices)
    35 of 115 notices are Limited / restricted (30%).
  • Route not published8%(9 notices)
    9 of 115 notices are Route not published (8%).
  • Selective5%(6 notices)
    6 of 115 notices are Selective (5%).
  • Open3%(3 notices)
    3 of 115 notices are Open (3%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 115 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 115 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 111 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 82 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£51mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 79 of 79 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 89%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£54k middle valuerobust · n=79Middle half £28k–£100k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Pathology Managed Service for Midlands & East 2 NetworkROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED——£32,000,000 †
NIV & Sleep Therapy Equipment and Consumables provisionResMed (UK) Limited23 Jun 20264 yrs · up to 5 yrs£8,763,195
≈ £2.2m/yr
Clinical Waste ManagementVEOLIA ES (UK) LIMITED——£3,304,486 †
Provision of Outsourced Elective Cardiology Catheter Lab ServicesSpire Healthcare Limited26 Mar 20261 yrs£654,599
≈ £655k/yr
LRI - Balmoral Plant Room Roof RepairsMidland Roofing Services (Derby) Ltd—9 mo£520,299 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

59 of 99 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 31 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 136 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Market Engagement for MES with associated Medical Consumables & Contrast MediaImaging equipment for medicalPlanned13 Oct 2026£707,000,000
Clinical Pods for UrologyAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Consumables - Specimen TransportAwarded / complete1 Oct 2026—
Maintenance; XEVO - Pathology Forensic Toxicology Lab PW035Awarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Maintenance - Trauma power tools PW024Awarded / complete17 Sept 2026—
Anonymous Reporting PlatformAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Amica Case Management SystemAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Insourced Services for Urgent Treatment CentreHospital servicesPlanning11 Sept 2026—
PW023 Provision of Facilities Management for No. 1 Bede IslandAwarded / complete27 Aug 2026—
Consumables - Equipment repairs and parts PW018Awarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
PW020 P50 ExtinguishersAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
C&C Heart Valves Human TissueHealth servicesAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Maintenance - CDI 550 blood parameter monitors - PW004Awarded / complete17 Aug 2026—
Maintenance; x3 OCT cameras PW016Awarded / complete30 Jul 2026—
Preston Lodge Pharmacy CouriersAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
Routine Pharmacy Transport LRI LGH GGHAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
Virtual Ward CouriersAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
C&C- Renal Dietetics ServiceHealth servicesAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
C&C Microbiology TestingPathology servicesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
NIV & Sleep Therapy Masks & EquipmentAwarded / complete8 Jul 2026—

Search all 136 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 59 of 99 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.