QUEST WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyWAKEFIELDYorkshire and the HumberMain market: Sewage removal services

Official UK PPONPDGH-2176-XHYD

Procedures with an award35 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities3named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Last 12 months3awards · 1 in the prior 24 months · last 10 Dec 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1end date on 2 of 5 awards · 1 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions3most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

5 awards (5 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 5 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 3 of 3 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedure · 33%
East of England1 procedure · 33%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedure · 33%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Other public body60%(3 awards)
    3 of 5 awards are Other public body (60%).
  • Local authority40%(2 awards)
    2 of 5 awards are Local authority (40%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Anglian Water Servicesframework/DPS on 1133.3%310 Dec 2025
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Councilframework/DPS on 1133.3%123 Feb 2023
Wrexham County Borough Councilframework/DPS on 1133.3%119 Jun 2025

Share = of the 3 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

2 of 5 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
County Road network9 Jun 2027 estimated£400,000

Recent awards

Latest 5 of 5 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Tankering ServicesAnglian Water Services10 Dec 2025£120,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 18 appointed suppliers
Tankering Services - Lot 3 - North WestAnglian Water Services10 Dec 2025£1
framework ceiling · 1 of 17 appointed suppliers
Tankering Services - Lot 4 - South WestAnglian Water Services10 Dec 2025£1
framework ceiling · 1 of 14 appointed suppliers
County Road networkWrexham County Borough CouncilNot published£400,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Cleaning, Repairs & Maintenance of Drains and Gullies on HighwaysCity of Bradford Metropolitan District CouncilNot published£800,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 5 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.