Vigilant Protect UK Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationCompanies House: Private Limited CompanyDumfriesNationwide (UK)Main market: Security services

Companies HouseSC212151 ↗Websitevigilant.uk ↗

Procedures with an award613 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities6named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£3.1mnet · on 2 of 13 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 29 Apr 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3end date on 10 of 13 awards · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions5most often Scotland
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.

An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.

Active awards, plus pending awards whose standstill has ended or was not published.

13 awards (11 for a named lot, 85%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 13 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7971 Security services11 awards · 85% · 9 awards naming a lot + 2 whole-procedure awards
7524 Public security, law and order services1 award · 8% · awards naming a lot
7999 Miscellaneous business-related services1 award · 8% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£3.1mOn 2 of 13 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 79). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

11.6% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 79
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
P24-0081: Scottish Enterprise: Facilities Management - Office ServicesScottish Enterprise——£1,812,502 †
Provision of Manned Security ServiceCOUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST——£1,318,068 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 6 of 6 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Scotland2 procedures · 33%
North East England1 procedure · 17%
North West England1 procedure · 17%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedure · 17%
East of England1 procedure · 17%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 2 Sept 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 1 lostindicative · n=1Fewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

1Bid for and never won with 1 of them on contract lots.
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
The Meads - Cleaning and Security ServicesRushmoor Borough Councillost122 Sept 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified69%(9 awards)
    9 of 13 awards are Type not classified (69%).
  • NHS & health31%(4 awards)
    4 of 13 awards are NHS & health (31%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Crescent Purchasing Consortium Limitedframework/DPS on 1116.7%521 Aug 2024
Scotland Excelframework/DPS on 1116.7%315 Mar 2024
North of England Commercial Procurement Collaborative (NOE CPC) (hosted by and acting through Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.)framework/DPS on 1116.7%212 Jul 2023
Scottish Enterprise116.7%110 May 2024
COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST116.7%119 Feb 2025
NHS Shared Business Services Limitedframework/DPS on 1116.7%129 Apr 2025

Share = of the 6 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

10 of 13 awards carry an end date, 10 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Guarding and Key Holding23 Feb 2028 estimated£65,000,000
Event Stewarding and Taxi Marshalling23 Feb 2028 estimated£3,500,000
Guarding, Key Holding, Event Stewarding and Taxi Marshalling23 Feb 2028 estimated£360,000

Recent awards

Latest 13 of 13 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Provision of Manned Security ServiceCOUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUSTNot published£1,318,068 †
from the contract notice
Guarding ServicesNHS Shared Business Services LimitedNot published£125,000,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
North EastCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£1,428,571 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
ScotlandCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£1,428,571 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
Yorkshire & The HumberCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£1,428,571 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
LondonCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£1,428,571 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
South EastCrescent Purchasing Consortium LimitedNot published£1,428,571 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
P24-0081: Scottish Enterprise: Facilities Management - Office ServicesScottish EnterpriseNot published£1,812,502 †
from the contract notice
Guarding and Key HoldingScotland ExcelNot published£65,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 15 appointed suppliers
Event Stewarding and Taxi MarshallingScotland ExcelNot published£3,500,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 0 of 13 awards, estimated from the published duration on 10 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.