Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 31 Oct 2025, 09:46 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

DDaT25380 - UKRI - BGS Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Procurement agent: UK Research and Innovation·On behalf of: UKSBS

ServicesAbove thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline value£800,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 4 yrsends 30 Mar 2030 · starts 31 Mar 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The purpose of this survey is to test the market and see what the market can offer and whether suppliers able to deliver what is required.

If UKRI decide to go to market, then In alignment with the Procurement Act 2023, information gathered as part of this Pre-Market Engagement activity shall be shared and made available to all potential suppliers to maintain a fair and transparent process, preventing any Supplier from gaining an unfair advantage and to avoid distorting competition. If there is any information you enter which you deem commercially sensitive and that you wish not to be shared to other suppliers, then please indicate within the specific response(s) in the questionnaire including your reason for them not to be part of the information to be shared to other potential suppliers.

This pre-market engagement notice is to help us understand the market.

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) have an existing web application firewall in Keyworth and Edinburgh, that is due to go end of life in December 2026 and needs to be replaced to maintain a secure operating environment and Cyber Essentials Plus certification, which critically underpins BGS commercial activities.

The primary objective for deploying the new solution is to enhance application security, ensure high availability, and optimise traffic management across the BGS operating environments in Keyworth and Edinburgh.

Functional and Non-functional Requirements

The Balancer solution must meet the following functional and non-functional requirements to ensure robust performance, security, and scalability.

Functional Requirements

  • SSL Offloading: Terminate SSL connections at the load balancer to reduce backend server load.
  • Traffic Inspection: Deep packet inspection to detect and block malicious traffic.
  • Application Layer Protection: Defend against OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including XSS, SQL injection, and CSRF.
  • Load Balancing Algorithms: Support for round-robin, least connections, and IP hash methods.
  • Session Persistence: Maintain user sessions across multiple requests.
  • Health Monitoring: Continuous checks on backend server health to ensure availability.
  • Content Switching: Route traffic based on URL, headers, or other application-level data.

Non-Functional Requirements

  • High Availability: Redundant architecture with failover capabilities (achieved by dual systems in Keyworth and Edinburgh)
  • Scalability: Ability to handle increasing traffic loads without performance degradation.
  • Performance: Low latency and high throughput under peak conditions.
  • Security Compliance: Adherence to standards such as PCI DSS, ISO 27001, and GDPR.
  • Manageability: Centralised management interface with role-based access control.
  • Logging & Auditing: Comprehensive logging for security events and administrative actions.
  • Interoperability: Compatibility with existing infrastructure and third-party tools.

Security and Compliance

The solution must align with industry-standard security and compliance frameworks to ensure data protection, regulatory adherence, and risk mitigation. Key considerations include:

  • Regulatory Standards: Support for compliance with PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001, GDPR, and other relevant regulations.
  • Data Protection: Encryption of data in transit and at rest, secure key management, and tokenisation where applicable.
  • Access Control: Role-based access control (RBAC), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and integration with identity providers.
  • Audit & Logging: Detailed logging of security events, configuration changes, and user activities to support forensic analysis and compliance reporting.
  • Vulnerability Management: Regular updates, patching, and integration with threat intelligence feeds to address emerging vulnerabilities.
  • Security Testing: Support for penetration testing, automated vulnerability scanning, and security validation during deployment cycles.

These measures ensure that the solution not only meets technical requirements but also aligns with organisational governance and risk management policies.

Integration and Monitoring

Successful deployment of the solution requires seamless integration with existing infrastructure and robust monitoring capabilities. Key integration and monitoring requirements include:

  • Infrastructure Integration: Compatibility with existing network architecture, DNS, firewalls, and application servers.
  • Identity & Access Management: Integration with LDAP, Active Directory, and SSO solutions for centralised authentication and authorisation.
  • SIEM & Logging Platforms: Support for integration with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools e.g. Microsoft Sentinel
  • Monitoring & Alerting: Real-time monitoring of traffic patterns, performance metrics, and security events with customisable alerting mechanisms.
  • API & Automation: RESTful API support for configuration management, automation, and orchestration with tools like Ansible, Terraform, and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Reporting & Dashboards: Centralised dashboards for visualising system health, performance, and security posture.

These capabilities ensure operational visibility, proactive threat detection, and streamlined management across diverse environments.

Support and Maintenance

To ensure long-term reliability and performance of the solution, the following support and maintenance practices are required:

  • Support: Access to technical support services, including 10/5 assistance, knowledge base, and escalation procedures.
  • Software Updates: Regular updates and patches to address security vulnerabilities, improve functionality, and maintain compliance.
  • Hardware Maintenance: Scheduled inspections, component replacements, and lifecycle management for physical appliances.

These practices help maintain system integrity, reduce downtime, and ensure that the solution continues to meet evolving business and security requirements.

Support:

5 year support - Level 1-3 Standard Service (10 hours x 5 days: 8am to 6pm Monday to Friday).

Providing - vendor software support, security patches and telephone support for the traffic management operating system (TMOS).

Hardware Maintenance:

5 year support - Next-Business-Day Hardware Replacement Service (RMA) (10 hours x 5 days: 8am to 6pm Monday to Friday). Next business day is acceptable given the high availability configuration.

Providing - replacement for defective hardware.

Implementation Support:

Onsite engineer support at Keyworth and Edinburgh for implementation.

Desired solution unique functionality includes:

WAF - ASM policies

APM - VPN

DNS - Global web site Load Balance (DNS)

LTM - Load Balancing of local traffic

VPN

To operate as an SSL VPN gateway and terminal server gateway.

Support active directory, saml and custom idp configurations.

Client/user attribute based rules.

Host checking including certificate/pathing/AV.

WAF

Advanced WAF (Web Application Firewall)

Be able to inspect API traffic and block malicious requests.

Supports JSON and XML payload inspection, which is essential for API protection.

Defends against common API threats like SQL injection, XSS, and API abuse.

Support ability to import openapi to create an api security defence policy.

Bot Protection

Detects and mitigates automated attacks on APIs (e.g., credential stuffing, scraping).

Uses behavioural analysis and machine learning to distinguish between legitimate users and bots.

Rate Limiting & Throttling

Prevents abuse by limiting the number of requests per user/IP/token.

Helps mitigate DDoS attacks targeting APIs.

Authentication & Access Control

Integrates with OAuth2, JWT, and other token-based authentication mechanisms.

Ensures only authorized users can access specific API endpoints.

API Discovery & Visibility

DNS

Needs to be able to query databases including Oracle to determine their high availability status.

Provide cross site load DNS level balancing

LTM

Being able to programmatically interact with traffic flow and security inspections using a like TCL syntactic language.

Be able to offload uploaded file scanning to antivirus using icap or cava

Specification:

The system specifications for the solution includes:

Hardware Specifications

  • Processor:

o 6 vCPUs

o 18 vCPUs available for tenant workloads

  • Memory:

o 128 GB DDR4 RAM

  • Storage:

o 1 × 1TB M.2 SSD

  • Form Factor:

o 1U rack-mountable chassis

o Dimensions: 1.72" (H) × 17.1" (W) × 30.6" (D)

o Weight: 36 lbs (16.33 kg)

Networking & Connectivity

  • Management Ports:

o 1 × 1000BASE-T (RJ-45)

o 1 × USB 3.0

o 1 × Serial Console

  • Data Ports:

o 2 × 100G/40G QSFP+/QSFP28

o 8 × 25G/10G SFP+/SFP28

Performance Metrics

  • Layer 7 (L7) Requests per Second: 3.3 million
  • Layer 4 (L4) Connections per Second: 1.4 million
  • L4 HTTP Requests per Second: 18 million
  • Max L4 Concurrent Connections: 85 million
  • Throughput:

o L4: 95 Gbps

o L7: 85 Gbps

CPV: Computer platforms · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support · Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How UK Research and Innovation buys Data-processing machines (hardware) (CPV 3021), and who usually turns up

UK Research and Innovation’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Data-processing machines (hardware) (CPV 3021) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerUK Research and Innovation · division 30
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 16 of 32 known-size awards · market: CPV 3021 · UK-wide, n=89
50%16%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 2 known-location awards · market: CPV 3021 · UK-wide, n=58
1 of 234%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 3021 · UK-wide, n=9
—25 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 25 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 24 of 50 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 3021 · UK-wide, n=139
48%45%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer170 lots with bid counts · all categories
24% had one bid
The market17 lots with bid counts · CPV 3021 · UK-wide
12% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid24% / 12%
Buyer: 41 of 170 lots with published bid counts. Market: 2 of 17 lots with published bid counts.
2–337% / 18%
Buyer: 63 of 170 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 17 lots with published bid counts.
4–621% / 6%
Buyer: 36 of 170 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 17 lots with published bid counts.
7+18% / 65%
Buyer: 30 of 170 lots with published bid counts. Market: 11 of 17 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer133 lots with estimate and award · all categories
47% below estimate
The market10 lots with estimate and award · CPV 3021 · UK-wide
50% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate47% / 50%
Buyer: 62 of 133 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%41% / 40%
Buyer: 54 of 133 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 4 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate13% / 10%
Buyer: 17 of 133 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 1 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 302148 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£800k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 17 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet12% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 17 similar lots
1 bid12%
2 of 17 similar past lots received 1 bid (12%).
2–318%
3 of 17 similar past lots received 2–3 (18%).
4–66%
1 of 17 similar past lots received 4–6 (6%).
7+65%
11 of 17 similar past lots received 7+ (65%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 7 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £800k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
31 Oct 2025, 09:46 GMT
Last source update
31 Oct 2025, 09:46 GMT
Authority reference
DDaT25380
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-069946
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Computer platformsIT services: consulting, software development, Internet and supportSoftware package and information systems
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05d798 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

31 Oct 2025 → 31 Mar 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published361 days ago
    31 Oct 2025, 09:46 GMT
  2. Market engagement353 days ago
    7 Nov 2025, 23:59 GMT

    The Contracting Authority UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) would like to conduct pre-market engagement.

    As part of this information gathering exercise, we have developed a series of questions to ascertain the capability, the capacity and the appetite of the current market and would welcome your responses.

    Please see below questions

    1.Company name

    2.Name of main contact

    3.Email address

    4.Please confirm if your organisation is able to deliver the requirement as detailed within the specification

    5.Are you registered on any Frameworks for the supply of Application delivery and security solutions that would fall in scope of this requirement? Required to answer.

    6.Since you have answered yes, please share the details, including the Framework name and Reference number.

    7.Please confirm if you have the capacity to deliver the goods by 31/03/2026 and have the systems in operation by 01/04/2026?

    8.Do you foresee any potential issues with this requirement that may need to be considered? Particularly any challenges with installation and ongoing usage of the solution?

    9.What is your anticipated cost range to deliver all of the requirement? Please detail the potential element that will contribute to total cost, such as hardware, software, training, maintenance etc.

    10.What are the lead times for the hardware required (in weeks)?

    11.Are there any barriers (e.g. time constraints) that could discourage you from bidding?

    12.Are there any new or emerging technologies, methods or innovations you think the Authority should consider for this requirement?

    13.What support do you offer post-installation and what are the cost implications?

    14.Are there any software necessary for the installation? If so, what are the costs associated (e.g. maintenance costs)

    Due to the timeframe required, please ensure to complete the questions and email your responses to DDaTProcurement@uksbs.co.uk before 14:00 hrs on 07th November 2025 to express your interest.

    If you would prefer the specification or questions in a document, please request them by emailing DDaTProcurement@uksbs.co.uk

  3. Contract starts211 days ago
    31 Mar 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    31 Oct 2025, 09:46 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

3 public bodies on the notice

UK Research and Innovation

Procurement agentPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PDQJ-7126-JDHG Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, South West, SN2 1FLContact email

Clients of the procurement agent

  • UKSBSBeneficiary authority
  • UK Shared Business Services LtdProcess contact pointProcuring entityShared Service ProviderGB-PPON: PMPN-7535-GNTG Swindon, South WestContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure