Find a TenderAwarded
Published 14 Aug 2024, 10:55 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Defence Contract Analysis and Reporting System (DefCARS) contract modification

Official notice

Authority: Single Source Regulations Office (Central government)

ServicesNegotiated without publication of a contract notice
Awarded value£1,275,000published contract · exc. VAT
Awarded 10 Jan 2022
Awarded to Risual Ltd

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Description

This VEAT notice explains the SSRO's intention to increase the maximum value of its contract dated 10 January 2022 with Risual Limited (the "Contract") for the design, build, migration, support, and development of the SSRO's Defence Contract Analysis and Reporting System (DefCARS) by 50% to £1,275,000 (exc. VAT). The original value of the Contract was £850,000 (exc. VAT). The SSRO intends to observe a voluntary standstill period of 10 days and will not conclude the Contract amendment before midnight on 27 August 2024 which is 10 clear calendar days following day of publication on 14 August 2024. No other amendments will be made to the Contract.

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Legal justification

Legal justification

The SSRO considers that the modification described in this VEAT notice is permitted under Regulations 72(1)(b) and 72(1)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, which permit the modification of contracts without a new procurement procedure in the following circumstances:

72(1)(b): for additional works, services or supplies by the original contractor that have become necessary and were not included in the initial procurement, where a change of contractor -

(i) cannot be made for economic or technical reasons such as requirements of interchangeability or interoperability with existing equipment, services or installations procured under the initial procurement, and

(ii) would cause significant inconvenience or substantial duplication of costs for the contracting authority, provided that any increase in price does not exceed 50% of the value of the original contract.

72(1)(c): where all of the following conditions are fulfilled -

(i) the need for modification has been brought about by circumstances which a diligent contracting authority could not have foreseen;

(ii) the modification does not alter the overall nature of the contract; and

(iii) any increase in price does not exceed 50% of the value of the original contract or framework agreement.

DefCARS is the SSRO's online, web-enabled system into which contractors with Qualifying Defence Contracts are required to input prescribed information pursuant to obligations imposed on them by the Defence Reform Act 2014 and the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014.

On 1 April 2024, the prescribed information required to be reported into DefCARS by Qualifying Defence Contractors was significantly augmented as a result of Schedule 10 of the Procurement Act 2023 and the Single Source Contract (Amendment) Regulations 2024 coming into force. While some changes to the legislation had been anticipated by the SSRO at the time of the initial procurement of the Contract in 2021, the extent of the changes was unknown and the magnitude of the changes (which were entirely outside of the SSRO's control) could not have been reasonably foreseen. The value of the Contract, which had been set based on anticipated system developments on a much smaller scale, is therefore insufficient to cover the developments which are now required to be made to DefCARS in order to ensure alignment with the new statutory reporting requirements. An increase in the Contract value by 50% is therefore necessary to accommodate these development services. The overall nature of the Contract remains unchanged.

Additionally, the SSRO considers that the following factors prevent a change of, or an additional, contractor to undertake these development services (and, in any event, would cause the following significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs):

  • Engaging another supplier would result in a duplication and overlapping of costs associated with onboarding, which would involve significant training and familiarisation.
  • Having two suppliers for the DevOps of DefCARS would increase complexity and require significant management overhead in relation to coordination and communication for which there is no capacity.
  • A new supplier, when one is already delivering the services, raises significant concern regarding attributing responsibility for technical issues such as incident and bugs. It would then not be possible, for example, to determine which supplier is responsible for resolving future issues. This may also render professional indemnity insurance policies ineffective.
  • The incumbent supplier has significant knowledge of the SSRO's bespoke code that relates to the WebApp, which has been developed over the last 30 months. It would not be possible for a new supplier to get up to speed with the code base to start delivering the additional development services without causing delays to implementing the changes arising from the new legislation which are a priority.
  • Granting a new supplier access to the SSRO's Azure environment, including admin privileges, raises significant security challenges, such as the need to establish new access controls and rebuild security configurations.

The SSRO is in the initial stages of preparing to conduct a new procurement exercise for a replacement contract beyond 9 January 2026, when the Contract to which this VEAT notice relates expires. It intends to undertake early market engagement later in 2024.

Delivery: London

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Negotiated without publication of a contract notice
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Awarded
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
14 Aug 2024, 10:55 BST
Last source update
14 Aug 2024, 10:55 BST
Authority reference
SSRO-C-107
FTS notice number
2024/S 000-025751
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
London (UKI31)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-048abe Find a Tender
Why no open competition
Additional deliveries by the original supplier ordered under the strict conditions stated in the directive
Published justification

Please refer to the Legal Justification in section II.2.4) Description of the procurement.

Review and risk notes
Review procedure

Review procedures are as set out in the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. Proceedings under those Regulations are time limited, and any such proceedings must be brought in the High Court of England and Wales.

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast
Awards 1
Awarded value £1,275,0001 contract exc. VAT
Contracts signed 1latest 10 Jan 2022
Awarded toValueDateStatus
Risual Ltd£1,275,000 †—Awarded

Contracts

  • Defence Contract Analysis and Reporting System (DefCARS) contract modification · Risual Ltd

    Signed
    10 Jan 2022
    Value
    £1,275,000
    Status
    active

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

SINGLE SOURCE REGULATIONS OFFICE

Contracting authorityCentral GovernmentNDPBRegulator G51/G52, 100 parliament Street, London, London, SW1A2BQContact name, email

Dispute resolution & review bodies

  • Leave BlankReview body Leave Blank

Bidders & participating suppliers

1 commercial party on the notice
  • Risual LimitedAwarded supplierGB-COH: 05431646 Risual House, Parker Court, Staffordshire Technology Park, Beaconside, Stafford, Staffordshire, West Midlands, ST18 0WP

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.