Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 28 May 2026, 13:36 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Exceptional Post 16 Provision

Authority: Cornwall Council (Local council)

ServicesOpen procedureAbove thresholdLight touch regimeSME suitableVCSE suitable
Planned pipeline value£15,000,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 18 Feb 2027from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 31 Aug 2030 · starts 1 Sept 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Education off contract services. exceptional, off contract for post 16 young persons

CPV: Education and training services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 3 yrsSMEVCSE
Contract period: 1 Sept 2027 – 31 Aug 2030 (3 yrs)
Delivery: South WestEligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Cornwall Council buys Education and training services (CPV 80), and who usually turns up

Cornwall Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Education and training services (CPV 80) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerCornwall Council · division 80
The marketEducation and training services (CPV 80) · South West England
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 85 of 98 known-size awards · market: division 80 · South West England, n=455
87%50%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning. Small firms win more of this buyer’s work than the market’s: 87% against 50%, n=98.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 99 of 102 known-location awards · market: division 80 · South West England, n=563
97%48%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered. More of this buyer’s work stays local than in this market: 97% against 48%, n=102.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 80 · South West England, n=49
—43 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 43 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 4 of 8 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 80 · South West England, n=460
50%62%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer60 lots with bid counts · all categories
12% had one bid
The market100 lots with bid counts · division 80 · South West England
15% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid12% / 15%
Buyer: 7 of 60 lots with published bid counts. Market: 15 of 100 lots with published bid counts.
2–347% / 29%
Buyer: 28 of 60 lots with published bid counts. Market: 29 of 100 lots with published bid counts.
4–615% / 35%
Buyer: 9 of 60 lots with published bid counts. Market: 35 of 100 lots with published bid counts.
7+27% / 21%
Buyer: 16 of 60 lots with published bid counts. Market: 21 of 100 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer44 lots with estimate and award · all categories
18% below estimate
The market82 lots with estimate and award · division 80 · South West England
39% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate18% / 39%
Buyer: 8 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 32 of 82 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%64% / 45%
Buyer: 28 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 37 of 82 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 16%
Buyer: 8 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 82 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 8036 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£15m

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 80. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 100 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet15% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 100 similar lots
1 bid15%
15 of 100 similar past lots received 1 bid (15%).
2–329%
29 of 100 similar past lots received 2–3 (29%).
4–635%
35 of 100 similar past lots received 4–6 (35%).
7+21%
21 of 100 similar past lots received 7+ (21%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £15m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Light touch regime
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
28 May 2026, 13:36 BST
Last source update
2 Oct 2026, 12:52 BST
Authority reference
DN794883
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-093327
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Education and training services
Delivery area
South West (UKK3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06a7b4 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

28 May 2026 → 1 Sept 2027 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published151 days ago
    28 May 2026, 13:36 BST
  2. Latest notice published24 days ago
    2 Oct 2026, 12:52 BST
  3. Market engagement19 days ago
    7 Oct 2026, 23:59 BST

    Dear Colleague,

    Thank you for the time, insight and expertise you have already contributed to the development of Cornwall’s Post-16 Inclusion Pathway. The sessions held so far have been invaluable in helping us understand what needs to be included within future Post-16 provision for young people with SEND, and how we can work together to strengthen outcomes, inclusion and transitions into adulthood.

    Through this work, we have heard clearly that Cornwall needs:

    • a clearer and more accessible online Post-16 prospectus;
    • stronger use of education passports so that information follows young people effectively;
    • better planning to prevent duplication of learning;
    • stronger embedding of Preparing for Adulthood outcomes across educational delivery;
    • improved tracking of young people’s destinations when they leave education;
    • clearer communication between the Council, providers, young people and families.

    We are now moving into the next stage of this work. The information gathered so far is helping us begin to shape the detail of future provision specifications, and we would like to invite providers to take part in a further round of Post-16 SEND Provision Market Engagement Sessions.

    These sessions will focus on two key areas.

    1. Fee modelling and value for money

    We know that Post-16 SEND education fees vary significantly across provision, including where provision appears to be similar in nature. We also know that Cornwall’s Post-16 expenditure places us as an outlier compared with comparable local authorities, but this level of investment is not yet translating into consistently stronger outcomes for young people.

    We therefore want to explore with providers whether there is appetite to develop a more transparent, tailored or bespoke fee model for Post-16 SEND provision in Cornwall. We recognise that providers operate in different ways, and that smaller providers may have different cost structures from larger FE colleges or lead-provider models. We want to understand what a fair, sustainable and outcomes-focused model could look like.

    1. Future contractual arrangements

    We also need to consider how Post-16 SEND provision should be formalised and contractualised in future. Current arrangements are varied, with some provision accessed through subcontracting routes and some provision operating outside those structures.

    The market engagement sessions will therefore explore potential future models, including:

    • whether Cornwall should go to market for a lead provider/umbrella organisation;
    • whether an open framework would be more appropriate for all providers to join;
    • If providers might contract directly with the Council, how contract management would operate, depending on value and volume;
    • what quality, monitoring and reporting requirements would need to be in place;
    • how we can ensure future arrangements support quality, inclusion, Preparing for Adulthood outcomes and value for money.

    These sessions are not part of a formal tender process. They are an opportunity for Cornwall Council to engage with our education providers and partners, and test what may be possible before finalising our commissioning intentions, specification and business case.

    As with previous engagement, we want to work collaboratively with providers so that future arrangements are realistic, deliverable and ambitious for young people with SEND. The earlier provider engagement sessions demonstrated the value of co-producing specifications, quality expectations and monitoring arrangements with the market, and we want to continue that approach.

    Proposed sessions

    We are proposing to hold market engagement sessions in late September and early October.

    We are proposing at least two dates for each area to ensure maximum attendance and engagement.

    Monday 5th October 1400-1600, Microsoft Teams online session (Fee Modelling)

    Tuesday 6th October 1000-1200, Microsoft Teams online session (Future Contractual Arrangements)

    Tuesday 6th October 1400-1630, Microsoft Teams online session (Fee Modelling Future Contractual Arrangements)

    Wednesday 7th October 1400-1630, Microsoft Teams online session (Fee Modelling and Future Contractual Arrangements)

    Please let us know which session you would like to attend by emailing tffcommissioning@cornwall.gov.uk.

    In addition, earlier in the summer we sent out a survey to you all relating to this engagement work. If you are unable to attend a session in the coming month, we would really appreciate it you could complete this survey. All data will be used to inform our evidence base, and will impact the future contractual and fee design. Post-16 Inclusion Pathway Market Engagement | Let's Talk Cornwall

    If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch at tffcommissioning@cornwall.gov.uk.

  4. Today
    26 Oct 2026
  5. Tender notice expectedin 115 days
    18 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
  6. Contract startsin 309 days
    1 Sept 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

3 events · 3 releases on Find a Tender · since 28 May 2026
  1. Pipeline notice published
    28 May 2026, 13:36 BST
    UK1
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    3 Aug 2026, 09:44 BST
    UK2
  3. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    2 Oct 2026, 12:52 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cornwall Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PYRH-9827-DWLP County Hall, Truro, South West, TR1 3AYContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (3)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure