Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 28 Jul 2026, 11:52 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Independent Policy Impact Assessment of Research Influence

Authority: York St John University (Education)

ServicesBelow threshold
Planned pipeline value£10,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 moends 31 Dec 2026 · starts 1 Oct 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

York St John University (YSJ) is preparing to procure specialist support to deliver an Independent Policy Impact Assessment of Research Influence.

The University wishes to commission an independent assessment of the impact of research undertaken at York St John University which has subsequently been cited within domestic and international policy frameworks. The purpose of the assessment is to evaluate the influence of this research and provide an evidence-based review of the resulting social, health, educational and economic impacts arising from policy adoption and implementation.

This pre-market engagement exercise is intended to inform the development of a future procurement and ensure that any Invitation to Tender (ITT) reflects current best practice, innovation and market capability.

Indicative scope of requirement

While requirements continue to be refined, the University anticipates that the appointed partner will support:

  • Review and assessment of identified policy documents and associated research outputs.
  • Development and application of an appropriate methodology to assess policy influence and downstream impacts.
  • Evaluation of social, health, educational and economic effects arising from research-informed policy outcomes.
  • Production of an independent report detailing findings, methodology, evidence sources and conclusions.
  • Stakeholder engagement, where appropriate, to substantiate impact claims and evidence pathways to impact.

The University is particularly interested in hearing from organisations and consultants with demonstrable experience of policy impact assessment within the UK and European policy environments and experience of evaluating the impact of university-led research.

Purpose of this engagement

This pre-market engagement exercise is designed to:

  • Test the University's current assumptions about delivery approach and scope.
  • Understand what represents standard practice in policy impact assessment and evaluation.
  • Identify innovative approaches, tools and methodologies emerging in the market.
  • Explore delivery models appropriate to the UK Higher Education context.
  • Understand indicative pricing models and likely costs associated with delivery.
  • Ensure any eventual ITT reflects practical, implementable and market-aligned requirements.

The University is particularly interested in understanding available methodologies, supplier capability, indicative delivery timescales and expected costs associated with conducting an independent assessment of research impact on public policy. Insights gathered will directly inform the final specification and procurement approach.

Engagement activities

During the engagement period, the University may:

•Invite suppliers to submit written responses or position statements

•Hold market engagement sessions or one-to-one discussions

•Request demonstrations of relevant methodologies, frameworks or tools

Participation is entirely voluntary and will not influence any future procurement evaluation.

How to participate

As part of this pre-market engagement exercise, suppliers are invited to provide responses to the following:

  1. Relevant Experience

Please provide brief details of up to three comparable projects delivered within the last five years involving:

  • Policy impact assessment.
  • Evaluation of research influence on policy development.
  • Assessment of social, economic, health or educational impacts arising from research.
  1. Proposed Methodology

How would you approach the assessment of university research cited within domestic and international policy?

  • What methodologies, frameworks or evaluation models would you typically apply?
  • What evidence sources would you expect to utilise?
  1. Delivery Approach
  • What information and support would you require from the University?
  • What are the key risks and dependencies associated with this type of project?
  • What would you consider to be a realistic delivery timescale?
  1. Expertise
  • Please outline the relevant experience and qualifications of the personnel/team who would be involved in delivering the work.
  • Please highlight any specific expertise relating to UK Higher Education, REF impact, UK Government policy, EU policy or public policy evaluation.
  1. Indicative Pricing
  • Please provide an indicative fee range for delivering the scope described within this notice. Please state the assumptions that underpin this estimate.
  • If applicable, please identify alternative pricing models that may be available.
  1. Market Feedback
  • Are there any aspects of the proposed scope that you believe should be refined, expanded or reduced?
  • What would you consider to represent industry best practice for this type of assessment?

Suppliers wishing to participate should submit their responses by email to procurement@yorksj.ac.uk with the subject line:

"PME Response - Policy Impact Assessment"

Further details regarding timelines and engagement activities will be shared with registered participants when available.

Important notice

This notice is issued solely for the purpose of pre-market engagement.

It:

•Does not constitute a call for competition

•Does not form part of any procurement process

•Does not commit the University to undertake any future procurement

The intention is to ensure that any future procurement is well-informed, proportionate and aligned to market capability.

CPV: Economic impact assessment · Evaluation consultancy services · Research consultancy services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How York St John University buys Market research services (CPV 7931), and who usually turns up

York St John University’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Market research services (CPV 7931) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerYork St John University · division 79
The marketMarket research services (CPV 7931) · Yorkshire and the Humber
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=39
50%44%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Yorkshire and the Humber.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 7 known-location awards · market: CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=46
29%20%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 decided notices · market: CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=14
52 days31 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 52 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 3 of 8 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=69
38%52%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 79
20% had one bid
The market19 lots with bid counts · CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber
16% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid20% / 16%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 19 lots with published bid counts.
2–340% / 26%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 19 lots with published bid counts.
4–60% / 21%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 19 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 37%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 19 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer7 lots with estimate and award · all categories
0% below estimate
The market21 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7931 · Yorkshire and the Humber
52% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate0% / 52%
Buyer: 0 of 7 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 11 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%100% / 24%
Buyer: 7 of 7 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0% / 24%
Buyer: 0 of 7 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 79313 monthsPublished estimate£10k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 19 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet16% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 19 similar lots
1 bid16%
3 of 19 similar past lots received 1 bid (16%).
2–326%
5 of 19 similar past lots received 2–3 (26%).
4–621%
4 of 19 similar past lots received 4–6 (21%).
7+37%
7 of 19 similar past lots received 7+ (37%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £10k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
28 Jul 2026, 11:52 BST
Last source update
28 Jul 2026, 11:52 BST
Authority reference
TEN039
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-071149
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Economic impact assessmentEvaluation consultancy servicesResearch consultancy services
Delivery area
Yorkshire & Humber (UKE21)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06d51b Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

28 Jul 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published92 days ago
    28 Jul 2026, 11:52 BST
  2. Market engagement75 days ago
    14 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST

    Engagement process description

    The University's objective is to establish an effective and proportionate approach for assessing the impact of university research that has informed policy development within the UK and internationally.

    This includes strengthening the University's ability to:

    • Measure and evidence the influence of research on policy development and implementation.
    • Assess the wider social, health, educational and economic outcomes linked to policy adoption.
    • Obtain robust independent analysis suitable for institutional reporting, impact evaluation and future research assessment exercises.

    The University is seeking market insight to inform how this requirement can best be delivered, including approaches, methodologies and innovations that are aligned to the Higher Education sector.

  3. Contract starts28 days ago
    1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    28 Jul 2026, 11:52 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

York St John University

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PGRG-9322-VXQG Lord Mayors Walk, York, Yorkshire & Humber, YO31 7EXContact email, phone

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure