Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 27 Jan 2026, 14:05 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Large Scale Non-Battery based Electrical Energy Storage Systems

Authority: UK Fusion Energy Ltd (Public body)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Architecture & Engineering (71) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£0pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 4 yrsends 31 Mar 2033 · starts 1 Apr 2029

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The following summary is not intended as a complete or definitive specification of the requirement. A purpose of this engagement is to seek information from the market to help refine our understanding and aid the development of a future specification.

STEP is currently in its Concept Design phase, which is expected to be completed by 2026.

The electrical infrastructure of STEP will resemble that of large conventional thermal power stations; however, its design presents unique challenges:

Fusion power stations like STEP have exceptionally large parasitic (auxiliary/house) loads required to initiate and sustain fusion reactions—significantly higher than those in conventional power plants.

These parasitic loads must be supplied by external sources during plant start-up, before the power generation cycle begins producing electricity.

The highly dynamic nature of these loads could make compliance with grid code requirements challenging.

For more information, please refer to: Staying positive: producing net power | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | The Royal Society

UKIFS is seeking experts to support the technology selection of a Central Energy Storage System (CESS) that is part of the STEP Electrical infrastructure. Due to the power dynamics of operating the STEP power plant and the operating parameters set by the National Energy System Operator (NESO), an energy storage system is required to provide a mechanism to ensure that we remain within the NESO operating parameters.

Rather than a continuous output, STEP will operate on a pulsed basis. The power dynamics of the fusion pulses are typically different to a conventional power plant. The CESS has been identified as a critical system to the design as it provides a mechanism to compensate for the changing load dynamics throughout the pulse. This will ensure STEP remains within the NESO defined operating parameters at the point of grid connection.

The scope of the CESS cannot be fully defined due to knowledge gaps in CESS behaviour and limitations. Once these are understood, a technology will be selected, and limitations will be incorporated into the electrical infrastructure design. This PME is looking to address the knowledge gaps.

The proposed technical and operations of the CESS are

•2 operational cycles per day

•Pulse length will be over 1 hour (continuous)

•Power range larger than 300MW

•Energy capacity 100-300MWh

•Response in the millisecond range

•Similar charge and discharge rates.

•Fast response time during power swings (full charge to discharge)

•High round trip efficiency: 80%

In conjunction the CESS will be required to be operated and maintained for the 20-year life of the STEP machine.

Due to the requirements, we are attempting to ascertain if this could be accomplished or partly accomplished by a non-battery-based system (Flywheel, Super-conducting magnetic storage (SMES), Capacitor, Super Capacitor, Fuel Cells or other)

For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at:

www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Culham… ↗

To respond to this opportunity, please click here:

www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/W8UFJUNW28 ↗

CPV: Electrical power systems design services · Engineering design services · Plant engineering design services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How UK Fusion Energy Ltd buys Engineering design services (CPV 7132), and who usually turns up

UK Fusion Energy Ltd’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Engineering design services (CPV 7132) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerUK Fusion Energy Ltd · division 71
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 of 17 known-size awards · market: CPV 7132 · UK-wide, n=177
35%54%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 3 known-location awards · market: CPV 7132 · UK-wide, n=131
3 of 351%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 11 decided notices · market: CPV 7132 · UK-wide, n=21
25 days33 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 25 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 10 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7132 · UK-wide, n=213
37%43%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer8 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 71
0% had one bid
The market41 lots with bid counts · CPV 7132 · UK-wide
10% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 10%
Buyer: 0 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 41 lots with published bid counts.
2–363% / 32%
Buyer: 5 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 13 of 41 lots with published bid counts.
4–625% / 20%
Buyer: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 41 lots with published bid counts.
7+13% / 39%
Buyer: 1 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 16 of 41 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer9 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 71
33% below estimate
The market25 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7132 · UK-wide
60% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate33% / 60%
Buyer: 3 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 15 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%67% / 28%
Buyer: 6 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 7 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0% / 12%
Buyer: 0 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 3 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 713248 monthsNo real estimate
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 41 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet10% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 41 similar lots
1 bid10%
4 of 41 similar past lots received 1 bid (10%).
2–332%
13 of 41 similar past lots received 2–3 (32%).
4–620%
8 of 41 similar past lots received 4–6 (20%).
7+39%
16 of 41 similar past lots received 7+ (39%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No real estimate
The buyer published £0 as the estimate (a placeholder, not the contract’s value), so there is nothing to forecast against.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
27 Jan 2026, 14:05 GMT
Last source update
27 Jan 2026, 14:05 GMT
Authority reference
PP-UKIFS-528
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-007128
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Electrical power systems design servicesEngineering design servicesPlant engineering design services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-060fbe Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

27 Jan 2026 → 1 Apr 2029 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published272 days ago
    27 Jan 2026, 14:05 GMT
  2. Market engagement216 days ago
    24 Mar 2026, 23:59 GMT

    To participate in this exercise, please complete and submit Appendix 1: Questionnaire and return any documents via the Delta portal. We are conscious of your time (and grateful to you for taking the time to complete the questionnaire), therefore we suggest you limit your responses to a maximum of 5 pages. If there are any areas you would like to expand on, please add a note to the relevant section for future discussion.

    If you experience any difficulties with the portal, please contact the portal helpdesk helpdesk@delta-esourcing.com cc operationalprocurement.step@ukifs.uk

    Information obtained from responses to Appendix 1: Questionnaire will help UKIFS understand current market capabilities and may shape the scope, direction, and design of the future procurement activities.

    If you have any questions about this Preliminary Market Engagement, please contact UKIFS through the Delta portal. We are keen to engage with suppliers to assist with the questionnaire if needed, to ensure quality responses enabling us to shape the future requirement and procurement.

    Following the submission and review of questionnaires, UKIFS intends to run an online conference call meeting/seminar/Q&A. The closing date for the pre-market engagement is Monday 23rd March 2026, 1 pm.

  3. Today
    27 Oct 2026
  4. Contract starts
    1 Apr 2029, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    27 Jan 2026, 14:05 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

United Kingdom Industrial Fusion Solutions

Contracting authorityPublic undertaking GB-PPON: PCRM-7973-DCBL Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Culham, South East, OX14 3DBContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure