Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 3 Feb 2026, 10:33 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

National Space Operations Centre (NSpOC): Optical Sovereign Sensor Software (OSSS)

Authority: UK Space Agency (Central government)

Services
Sectors: IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£1,500,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 18 May 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

UKSA has recently begun the hardware deployment of our Space Domain Awareness optical tracking stations. To operate these effectively, we require software that will enable the autonomous, remote and safe tasking of the sensors and their supporting hardware, with calibrated and corrected high-quality data returned to the central NSpOC wide C2 system (BOREALIS) via an API.

Suppliers will be required to deliver three high level elements whose architecture and interfaces must be appropriately documents - a Microsoft Azure based sensor network C2 system, an on-premises C2 and hardware safety system and a separate optical processing pipeline that will generate the tracking/pointing and hardware instructions to execute the sensor sessions and return calibrated and corrected satellite tracklets.

UKSA will require the successful supplier to utilise the existing hardware manufacturer provided software interfaces and to use existing commercially available/open-source plate-solving software packages. This is to preserve hardware warranties and minimise assurance activities.

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Provision of commercial off-the-shelf software solution and software development as…Planned

Provision of commercial off-the-shelf software solution and software development as per the description outlined above.

UKSA anticipates launching this procedure in mid-March, with a planned deadline for bid submission of 24th April 2026. Contract award is planned for mid-late May with a targeted kick-off of 1st June.

**UKSA intends to place this requirement via the Space-Enabled and Geospatial Services Dynamic Purchasing System (RM6235). UKSA will NOT be able to issue tender documentation to bidders who do not meet the filter requirements set.

UKSA will also require Cyber Essentials Plus accreditation is in place at point of bid submission for this tender. Any bidders without Cyber Essentials Plus accreditation will be rejected.

Owing to the security requirements relating to access to BOREALIS, this tender will be restricted to Uk-registered companies where all strategic decisions are undertaken in the UK by UK nationals on grounds of security. International subcontractors and project consortia partners will be permitted, though UKSA reserves the right to require changes to project consortia and/or subcontracting arrangements where a proposed structure represents a security risk.**

Delivery: UK

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How UK Space Agency buys IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72), and who usually turns up

UK Space Agency’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerUK Space Agency · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 9 known-size awards · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=3,447
33%37%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no winner locations published · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=2,655
—37%

No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=398
—50 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 50 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 3 of 4 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=5,289
3 of 463%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer8 lots with bid counts · all categories
13% had one bid
The market789 lots with bid counts · division 72 · UK-wide
12% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid13% / 12%
Buyer: 1 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 97 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
2–325% / 28%
Buyer: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 219 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
4–625% / 28%
Buyer: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 223 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
7+38% / 32%
Buyer: 3 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 250 of 789 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 4 lots with estimate and award, 5 needed · all categories
The market531 lots with estimate and award · division 72 · UK-wide
46% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate46%
Market: 244 of 531 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%38%
Market: 200 of 531 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate16%
Market: 87 of 531 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1Provision of commercial off-the-shelf software solution and software development as…CPV 72Published estimate£1.5m

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 72. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 789 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet12% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 789 similar lots
1 bid12%
97 of 789 similar past lots received 1 bid (12%).
2–328%
219 of 789 similar past lots received 2–3 (28%).
4–628%
223 of 789 similar past lots received 4–6 (28%).
7+32%
250 of 789 similar past lots received 7+ (32%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.5m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueWhy listed
ST Engineering Antycip SASEarlier contractNational Space Operations Centre: STK and ODTK Software Licencesended Mar 2026—£97kMatched as the earlier contract

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

What this replaces
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

45% title match.

A past supplier may not bid again.

The prior contract this notice most likely re-tenders · matched by title and category (45% title match), the holder is not guaranteed to re-bid

National Space Operations Centre: STK and ODTK Software Licences — held by ST Engineering Antycip SAS; the published contract ends 31 Mar 2026.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
3 Feb 2026, 10:33 GMT
Last source update
3 Feb 2026, 10:33 GMT
Authority reference
UKSAC26_0014
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-009326
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-061511 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

3 Feb 2026 → 18 May 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published266 days ago
    3 Feb 2026, 10:33 GMT
  2. Tender notice expected163 days ago
    18 May 2026, 00:00 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

UK Space Agency

Contracting authorityCentral GovernmentMinistry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisionsScience, Innovation and Technology Quad Two Building (1st Floor), Rutherford Avenue, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus, Didcot, South East, OX110DFContact name, email

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.