Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Services

Authority: West Sussex County Council (Local council)

Services
Planned pipeline value£20,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 1 Dec 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Specialist parent-infant psychological therapy service for expectant parents and parents with children aged 0-2 years living in West Sussex.

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach NoticePlanned

This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach Notice. This notice is subject to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For the avoidance of doubt, this is not a procurement via Procurement Act 23 or Public Contract Regulations 2015.<br/><br/>West Sussex County Council is releasing this Intended Approach Notice as per the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) using the Most Suitable Provider route. As per schedule 5 under Regulation 10 of the PSR, please see the following information below:<br/><br/>1. WSCC is intending to follow the Most Suitable Provider Process to award a contract.<br/><br/>2. The contract title: Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Service. The contract reference: I-89168.<br/><br/>3. The aim is to procure a Specialist parent-infant psychological therapy service for expectant parents and parents with children aged 0-2 years living in West Sussex. Due to the specialist nature of the service, all practitioners delivering therapeutic interventions must hold appropriate professional qualifications and, where applicable, maintain registration with a relevant professional or regulatory body. They should also be experienced in delivering specialist parent-infant psychological therapy in both group and one-to-one settings. <br/><br/>4. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intended approach notice under the PSR.<br/><br/>5. Should you wish to be considered, written representations should be sent to BSDProcurement@westsussex.gov.uk ensuring the following details are referenced:<br/><br/>Project reference: I-89168<br/><br/>Project title: Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Service - Most Suitable Provider process<br/><br/>This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 27 October 2026 and will be open to representations until 12pm, 10 November 2026. Additional information: This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 27 October2026 and will be open until 12pm, 10 November 2026.<br/><br/>This notice is published by West Sussex County Council pursuant to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 as notice of its intention to follow the Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process.<br/><br/>The requirement concerns the procurement of Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Services. The proposed contract term is 1 December 2026 to 30 November 2027. The total contract value is £20,000.<br/><br/>West Sussex County Council considers the MSP process appropriate because Direct Award Processes A, B and C do not apply.<br/><br/>The likely provider who has been identified by WSCC has committed £5,000 from their own charitable resources to this project and has worked with a local nursery provider to secure an additional £5,000 of resource should they be awarded this provision. This notice is being published for at least 14 calendar days before assessment of providers against the key criteria. Any provider not presently known to West Sussex County Council that believes it is capable of delivering these services may ask to be considered as a potential provider.<br/><br/>In accordance with the Provider Selection Regime, West Sussex County Council will assess likely providers against the five mandatory key criteria and the basic selection criteria.<br/><br/>The key criteria to be applied in order of importance to this procurement are:<br/><br/>1. Quality and innovation <br/>2. Integration, collaboration and service sustainability<br/>3. Value<br/>4. Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice<br/>5. Social value<br/><br/>The basic selection criteria will be applied on a pass/fail basis and will include:<br/><br/>- suitability to pursue the activity, including relevant regulatory and accreditation requirements;<br/>- economic and financial standing, where relevant; and<br/>- technical and professional ability.

Delivery: South East

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How West Sussex County Council buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

West Sussex County Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerWest Sussex County Council · division 85
The marketHealth services (CPV 8510) · South East England
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 12 of 24 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=336
50%36%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South East England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 22 of 31 known-location awards · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=530
71%47%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 decided notices · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=10
87 days68 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 87 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 21 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=291
78%73%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer8 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
13% had one bid
The market68 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · South East England
16% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid13% / 16%
Buyer: 1 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 11 of 68 lots with published bid counts.
2–350% / 28%
Buyer: 4 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 68 lots with published bid counts.
4–625% / 35%
Buyer: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 24 of 68 lots with published bid counts.
7+13% / 21%
Buyer: 1 of 8 lots with published bid counts. Market: 14 of 68 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer14 lots with estimate and award · all categories
50% below estimate
The market41 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · South East England
29% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate50% / 29%
Buyer: 7 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 12 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%43% / 66%
Buyer: 6 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 27 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate7% / 5%
Buyer: 1 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 2 of 41 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach NoticeCPV 8510Published estimate£20k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 68 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet16% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 68 similar lots
1 bid16%
11 of 68 similar past lots received 1 bid (16%).
2–328%
19 of 68 similar past lots received 2–3 (28%).
4–635%
24 of 68 similar past lots received 4–6 (35%).
7+21%
14 of 68 similar past lots received 7+ (21%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £20k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
Last source update
27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
Authority reference
I-89168
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-101542
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
South East (UKJ2)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-079135 Find a Tender

Publisher note: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach Notice.<br/><br/>The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. It is the intention to award a contract using the Most Suitable Provider process (MSP).

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

27 Oct 2026 → 1 Dec 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published15h ago
    27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
  2. Today
    28 Oct 2026
  3. Tender notice expectedin 33 days
    1 Dec 2026

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

West Sussex County Council

Contracting authorityLocal CouncilRegional or local authorityGeneral public services County Hall, Chichester, South East, PO19 1RGContact name, email

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.