Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Payment services provider and merchant acquirer for card payments at Cheshire East Borough Council's Car Parks

Authority: Cheshire East Council (Local council)

GoodsOpen procedureAbove thresholdSME suitable
Published estimate£400,000≈ £133k / year · £480,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 27 Oct 202612:00 GMT · 12h left
Clarification cut-off 16 Oct 202612:00 BST · questions to the authority
Contract term 3 yrsends 31 Jan 2030 · up to 31 Jan 2031 with extensions · starts 1 Feb 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

A tender for the provision of Combined Payment Services/ Merchant acquirer (PSP/MA) for car parking machines across Cheshire East Borough. This requirement is for an end to end payment processing service. The winning bidder must be able to provide Combined Payment Services Provider /Merchant Acquiring for 3 types of parking payment machines across the borough.

  • The authority expects to re-tender this requirement around 12 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT.

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Renewal 3 yrsSMEPublished value£400,000
Contract period: 1 Feb 2027 – 31 Jan 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 31 Jan 2031 with extensionsValue: £400,000 exc. VAT · £480,000 inc. VAT
Delivery: North WestEligibility: SME eligibleTurnover guideline: ~£266,423/yr≈ 2× annual value
Extensions: Initial contract period is 3 years to January 2030 with 1 x 12 month extension - giving a final possible end date of January 2031
Pre-qualification & selection criteria (PQQ)2
  • Economic & financial standing

    As per the requirements of tender pack and the Software and Hardware services agreement.

  • Technical & professional ability

    Relevant Experience and Contract Examples

    Details of up to three contracts to meet the technical ability criteria set out in the Associated Tender Documents

    You should demonstrate how your contracts and experience meet the critical project specific requirements as outlined in the tender documents.

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 10%Price: 80%Social value: 10%
Published award criteria (3)
  • Price: As per tender documents.
  • Quality: Downtime - fault resolution process and how issues are resolved, and how quickly are issues resolved and how do you inform the Council? Ensure fast efficient transactions at the payment machines and how you remedy slow processing speeds Actions you take to review the contract with council staff e.g. account review meetings on a quarterly basis
  • Social Value: Suppliers Social Value offer, as per tender documents.
Conditions of participation2
  • Economic & financial standing

    As per the requirements of tender pack and the Software and Hardware services agreement.

  • Technical & professional ability

    Relevant Experience and Contract Examples

    Details of up to three contracts to meet the technical ability criteria set out in the Associated Tender Documents

    You should demonstrate how your contracts and experience meet the critical project specific requirements as outlined in the tender documents.

What this means for your bid
  • Price carries 80 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 8 points. This one is won on the number: sharpen the price before polishing the prose.
  • Turnover usually expected at this size: about £266,423 (twice the annual value).

Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Cheshire East Council buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up

Cheshire East Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerCheshire East Council · division 48
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 7 of 17 known-size awards · market: division 48 · North West England, n=455
41%33%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in North West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 4 of 24 known-location awards · market: division 48 · North West England, n=588
17%12%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 48 · North West England, n=44
—56 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 56 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 17 of 19 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 48 · North West England, n=700
89%67%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer35 lots with bid counts · all categories
20% had one bid
The market61 lots with bid counts · division 48 · North West England
13% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid20% / 13%
Buyer: 7 of 35 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
2–329% / 26%
Buyer: 10 of 35 lots with published bid counts. Market: 16 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
4–614% / 36%
Buyer: 5 of 35 lots with published bid counts. Market: 22 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
7+37% / 25%
Buyer: 13 of 35 lots with published bid counts. Market: 15 of 61 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer21 lots with estimate and award · all categories
43% below estimate
The market35 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · North West England
54% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate43% / 54%
Buyer: 9 of 21 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 19 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%52% / 23%
Buyer: 11 of 21 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate5% / 23%
Buyer: 1 of 21 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 4836 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£400k

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 48. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

4expected bids16% chance of a single bid
similar past contests in this category: 202
Forecast chances for this lot
1 bid16%
Chance this lot gets 1 bid: 16%. This is a forecast.
2–317%
Chance this lot gets 2–3: 17%. This is a forecast.
4–616%
Chance this lot gets 4–6: 16%. This is a forecast.
7+52%
Chance this lot gets 7+: 52%. This is a forecast.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

Based on 48 comparable awards. Each lot reflects its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

£372k7% below estimate
48 comparable awards
Forecast compared with the buyer’s estimate
Middle 50%£320k–£400k
Half of likely prices fall between £320,226 and £400,000.
Estimate£400k
The buyer published an estimate of £400,000 for this lot.
A 19% chance the award lands exactly on the estimate.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

SupplierWon in this categoryLive contractsAward vs estimate
Buyer regular15 wins in North West England19 panel places
£47m158 awards in 36m · last this month63 live · £163m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

7% below n=19
1 win in North West England2 panel places
£37m18 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago5 live · £100m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

42% below n=2
2 wins in North West England2 panel places
£18m15 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago3 live · £8.8m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

18% below n=5
2 wins in North West England
£13m21 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago7 live · £8.1m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

19% below n=2
3 wins in North West England1 panel places
£10m20 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago8 live · £3.4m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

at estimate n=7
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Yes · next expected 12 Nov 2026
First published
1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
Last source update
1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end – 11 Nov 2026
Authority reference
C5409
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-092760
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
North West (UKD62)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077e76 Find a Tender
Review and risk notes
Risks

None

How to participate & submission route

Official notice
Requests to participate (first stage)
—
Tender submission deadline
27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
16 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release

Tenders are available via The Chest -

www.the-chest.org.uk ↗

Proactis Help line number for Suppliers: 0330 005 0352

Published estimate £400,000 excludes VAT (£480,000 including VAT).

Timeline

1 Oct 2026 → 1 Feb 2027 · 5 dates
  1. Tender notice published26 days ago
    1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
  2. Clarification questions by11 days ago
    16 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
  3. Today
    26 Oct 2026
  4. Submission deadlinein 1 day
    27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
  5. Award decision expected byin 16 days
    11 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  6. Contract startsin 97 days
    1 Feb 2027

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
    UK4

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cheshire East Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PTWR-7124-XZXQ Delamere House, Delamere Street, Crewe, North West, CW12JZContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender