Official UK procurement notice
SPFT - GP Primary Care input to Forensic Services Hellingly
Authority: Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement description'GP Support to Forensic Services - Hellingly
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1GP support to forensic inpatient units in HellinglyAwarded
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Procedure method
- Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Awarded without competition
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Direct award (no call for competition)
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 3 Feb 2026, 16:39 GMT
- Last source update
- 3 Feb 2026, 16:39 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-009633- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0615cdFind a Tender
- Why no open competition
- The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive
- Published justification
'This contract has been awarded under the urgent circumstances provision of the Provider Selection Regime (PSR). This contract has been awarded under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award.'<br/><br/>Change in practice enforced by external circumstances (CQC suspension of new registration and LMC agreeing Battle Road will take on). Local intelligence shows that other local practices unlikely to be interested in bidding for a contract.<br/><br/>PSR states that where a contract is awarded under the above circumstances, the Authority must set the length of contract to be only as long as is strictly necessary to address the urgent situation and to conduct a full award process for that service at the earliest feasible opportunity. If the term is to be longer than 12 months relevant authorities must justify and record this decision. <br/><br/>For this contract award intelligence gathered from other local practices indicates that if n competitive MSP approach was taken (on the basis that procurement would be limited to GP practices, and they would be local to Hellingly), Battle Road would be the practice most willing and appropriate to deliver the contract. It is therefore recommended that a 2+1 year contract is awarded.<br/><br/><br/>Decision Makers were <br/>Mike Lander Deputy Director – Contracts Evaluator and CO<br/>George Guerges Evaluator and SRO<br/>Taofeeq Ladega Senior Category Manager - Healthcare/ Clinical Procurement Procurement strategy, moderator and notices publication<br/>Alison Nuttall Managing Director Evaluator and Ops lead
Publisher note: 'This contract has been awarded under the urgent circumstances provision of the Provider Selection Regime (PSR). This contract has been awarded under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award.'<br/><br/>Change in practice enforced by external circumstances (CQC suspension of new registration and LMC agreeing Battle Road will take on). Local intelligence shows that other local practices unlikely to be interested in bidding for a contract.<br/><br/>PSR states that where a contract is awarded under the above circumstances, the Authority must set the length of contract to be only as long as is strictly necessary to address the urgent situation and to conduct a full award process for that service at the earliest feasible opportunity. If the term is to be longer than 12 months relevant authorities must justify and record this decision. <br/><br/>For this contract award intelligence gathered from other local practices indicates that if n competitive MSP approach was taken (on the basis that procurement would be limited to GP practices, and they would be local to Hellingly), Battle Road would be the practice most willing and appropriate to deliver the contract. It is therefore recommended that a 2+1 year contract is awarded.
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battle Road Medical CentreSME | £45,000 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Contract 009633-2026-1 · Battle Road Medical CentreSME
- Signed
- 9 Jan 2026
- Value
- £45,000
- Status
- active
Bid statistics published by the authority
| Bids | SME | VCSE | Valid bid range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1bids | — | — | — |
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- Battle Road Medical CentreAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.