NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS TRUST (NEST) CORPORATION: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Public corporationGreater Londonlondon

Official UK PPONPQGC-5667-VDDT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months57+280% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 11 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share23%of 65 awarded procedures · 73 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

65 awarded tenders, 73 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3215 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£13mnet · on 48 of 51 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 46%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 72 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(67 notices)
    67 of 72 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(5 notices)
    5 of 72 notices are Framework (7%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open32%(23 notices)
    23 of 72 notices are Open (32%).
  • Selective21%(15 notices)
    15 of 72 notices are Selective (21%).
  • Direct award18%(13 notices)
    13 of 72 notices are Direct award (18%).
  • Route not published18%(13 notices)
    13 of 72 notices are Route not published (18%).
  • Limited / restricted11%(8 notices)
    8 of 72 notices are Limited / restricted (11%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=110% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 14 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

39 daysrobust · n=14
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 73 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

020 of 73 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 6 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=6

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
ALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1812.3%885 Oct 2026
Willis Towers Watson57.7%5530 Sept 2026
Hymans Robertson34.6%351 Jul 2026
Towers Watson Ltdframework/DPS on 134.6%3523 Apr 2026
Sanderson Executive Ltdframework/DPS on 134.6%3318 Jul 2025
INTERQUEST GROUP (UK) LIMITEDframework/DPS on 123.1%2418 Jul 2025
CEM BENCHMARKING UK LIMITED23.1%22—
Avida Internationalframework/DPS on 123.1%2230 Oct 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 23% of 65 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 73 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£13mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 48 of 51 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 46%; a further 9 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£113k middle valuerobust · n=48Middle half £50k–£300k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
TEN2627- 008 (PA20230 Provision of digital specialistsSullivan and Stanley Limited14 Jul 20262 yrs£3,000,000
≈ £1.5m/yr
Target operating model phase 4ALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITED13 Jan 20263 mo£986,274
CON-2526-002 Fund Admin Transition and Transformation ProgrammeALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITED16 Apr 20252 yrs · up to 4 yrs£635,000
≈ £318k/yr
TEN-2526-031(PA23) Brand fundamentalsThe Clearing Consultancy Ltd19 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£550,000
≈ £183k/yr
TEN-2526-033(PA2023)- Strategic Communications servicesBradshaw Advisory16 Feb 20261 yrs · up to 3 yrs£523,328
≈ £523k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

64 of 65 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 32 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 73 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
TEN-2526-043 (PA2023) Digital Tracking ToolTechnical analysis or consultancy servicesAwarded / complete23 Oct 2026£160,000
Journey Mapping & Management ToolAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026—
TEN-2526-011 - Lot 2 - Call off no 9Awarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
TEN-2526-011 - Lot 2 - Call off no 12Awarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
CON -2627-059-PA23 - Board accountability consultancy supportAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Retirement consultancy FrameworkAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
retirement consultancy servicesAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Media PartnershipAdvertising servicesAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026£1,000,000
TEN-2425-043 Recruitment Services - Investment Manager - Private Credit - Call-OffAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
TEN-2425-043 Recruitment Services - Head of Portfolio Risk - Call-OffAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
TEN-2627-047 (PA2023) – Asset Allocation SystemSoftware implementation servicesOpen15 Sept 2026£7,300,000
Management Pathways DesignAwarded / complete7 Sept 2026—
Harnham Recruitment AgencyAwarded / complete4 Sept 2026—
Social-First Creative AgencyAdvertising campaign servicesOpen2 Sept 2026£900,000
Coaching PlatformCoaching servicesAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026£270,000
Performance Marketing AgencyFramework4 lotsMarketing servicesOpen26 Aug 2026£4,100,000
Everyday Investor 5Awarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
Global Leaders Benchmarking Subscription ServicesAwarded / complete14 Aug 2026—
Lot 2 - Call off no 8Awarded / complete11 Aug 2026—
Retirement Consultancy Framework - Lot 1 - Call-off 1 - Whole of Life Retirement Charging StrategyAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026—

Search all 73 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 64 of 65 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.