NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT SAVINGS TRUST (NEST) CORPORATION: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Public corporationGreater Londonlondon

Official UK PPONPQGC-5667-VDDT

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months57+280% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 11 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share23%of 65 awarded procedures · 73 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

65 awarded tenders, 73 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months3215 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£13mnet · on 48 of 51 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 46%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 72 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(67 notices)
    67 of 72 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework7%(5 notices)
    5 of 72 notices are Framework (7%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open32%(23 notices)
    23 of 72 notices are Open (32%).
  • Selective21%(15 notices)
    15 of 72 notices are Selective (21%).
  • Direct award18%(13 notices)
    13 of 72 notices are Direct award (18%).
  • Route not published18%(13 notices)
    13 of 72 notices are Route not published (18%).
  • Limited / restricted11%(8 notices)
    8 of 72 notices are Limited / restricted (11%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=110% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 14 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

39 daysrobust · n=14
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 73 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

020 of 73 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 6 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=6

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
ALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1812.3%885 Oct 2026
Willis Towers Watson57.7%5530 Sept 2026
Hymans Robertson34.6%351 Jul 2026
Towers Watson Ltdframework/DPS on 134.6%3523 Apr 2026
Sanderson Executive Ltdframework/DPS on 134.6%3318 Jul 2025
INTERQUEST GROUP (UK) LIMITEDframework/DPS on 123.1%2418 Jul 2025
CEM BENCHMARKING UK LIMITED23.1%22—
Avida Internationalframework/DPS on 123.1%2230 Oct 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 23% of 65 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 73 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£13mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 48 of 51 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 46%; a further 9 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£113k middle valuerobust · n=48Middle half £50k–£300k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
TEN2627- 008 (PA20230 Provision of digital specialistsSullivan and Stanley Limited14 Jul 20262 yrs£3,000,000
≈ £1.5m/yr
Target operating model phase 4ALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITED13 Jan 20263 mo£986,274
CON-2526-002 Fund Admin Transition and Transformation ProgrammeALPHA FINANCIAL MARKETS CONSULTING UK LIMITED16 Apr 20252 yrs · up to 4 yrs£635,000
≈ £318k/yr
TEN-2526-031(PA23) Brand fundamentalsThe Clearing Consultancy Ltd19 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£550,000
≈ £183k/yr
TEN-2526-033(PA2023)- Strategic Communications servicesBradshaw Advisory16 Feb 20261 yrs · up to 3 yrs£523,328
≈ £523k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

64 of 65 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 32 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 73 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Lot 3, Call-Off 1Awarded / complete10 Aug 2026—
Digital SpecialistsAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete29 Jul 2026—
TEN-2627-009 (PA2023) - Climate-Aware CMAsBanking and investment servicesOpen29 Jul 2026£150,000
Board Effectiveness ReviewPerformance review servicesAwarded / complete21 Jul 2026£80,000
TEN-2526-037 (PA2023) Retirement Consultancy Framework - Lot No 2, Call-Off No 14 lotsPension fund consultancy servicesAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026£3,000,000
TEN- 2526-011 - Lot 2 - Call off no 6Awarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
B2B Research Community - User PanelResearch servicesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026£300,000
CON-2526-026-PA23 – Between the BridgesAwarded / complete9 Jul 2026—
CON-2526-PA2023- 161 - CRFAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
Retirement Income BlueprintAwarded / complete26 Jun 2026—
CON-2627-021-PA23-Inalytics Limited TransitionsAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
TEN- 2526-011 - Lot 2 - Call off no 5Awarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
Salary SurveyAwarded / complete19 Jun 2026—
Real Estate BenchmarkingAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
Investment Management PlatformIndustry specific software packagePlanned26 May 2026—
TEN-2425-043 - Recruitment servicesFramework4 lotsRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026£2,800,000
Brand FundamentalsAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026£550,000
Fresco SegmentationAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Creative Production Studio OverflowFramework2 lotsDocument creationAwarded / complete11 May 2026£960,000

Search all 73 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 64 of 65 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.