Arun District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authoritySouth East EnglandLittlehamptonRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPBGG-5335-TMCXWebsitearun.gov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months6+50% vs prior 12 months (4)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot3.525% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share20%of 10 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

10 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£469knet · on 7 of 7 published values · top 5 = 85%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 10 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(10 notices)
    10 of 10 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted30%(3 notices)
    3 of 10 notices are Limited / restricted (30%).
  • Open30%(3 notices)
    3 of 10 notices are Open (30%).
  • Direct award20%(2 notices)
    2 of 10 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Route not published20%(2 notices)
    2 of 10 notices are Route not published (20%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3.5moderate · n=425% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 10 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 10 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

35.4% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
PROTECTOR INSURANCE (UK)110%125 Jan 2026
Risk Management Partners Ltd110%115 Jan 2026
JDi Solutions Ltd110%11—
Enplan UK Limited110%11—
HANKINSON DUCKETT ASSOCIATES LIMITED110%11—
MUFG Corporate Markets Treasury Limited110%11—
Venn Group Limited110%11—
Ethos Consultants Ltd110%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 10 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£469kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 7 of 7 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 85%; a further 4 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£62k middle valuerobust · n=7Middle half £42k–£65k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Interim Agency StaffVenn Group Limited—6 mo£162,000 †
Provision of OpusConsult Planning Consultation SoftwareJDi Solutions Ltd—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£66,450 †
≈ £22k/yr
Arun Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP)Ethos Consultants Ltd—1.5 yrs£64,000 †
≈ £43k/yr
Treasury Management Consultancy ServicesMUFG Corporate Markets Treasury Limited—3 yrs · up to 5 yrs£62,150 †
≈ £21k/yr
Landscape Study ProcurementHANKINSON DUCKETT ASSOCIATES LIMITED—6 mo · up to 1 yrs£43,137 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

12 of 13 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 16 of 15 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Specialist Compliance Officer (Water Hygiene)Awarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Provision of OpusConsult Planning Consultation SoftwareAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
Provision of Interim Agency StaffAwarded / complete27 Apr 2026—
ESCC et al Supported Housing Strategy - Pre-Market Engagementprocuring entityHealth and social work servicesPlanning6 Mar 2026—
Treasury Management Consultancy ServicesAwarded / complete26 Feb 2026—
Provision of Insurance Services to Arun District Council4 lotsAccident and health insurance servicesAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026£6,860,000
Arun Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP)Awarded / complete30 Dec 2025—
Landscape Study ProcurementAwarded / complete19 Dec 2025—
Bewley Road, Planning AppealAwarded / complete10 Sept 2025—
Hastings Close - Flat Roof Replacement, Drainage alterations and Cladding RefurbishmentRoof repair and maintenance workOpen20 Jun 2025£540,000
Consultancy Support for Local Plan UpdateBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesOpen12 Nov 2024£400,000
Civic Centre & Bognor Regis Town Hall Provision of Concierge & Security ServicesSecurity servicesAwarded / complete17 May 2024£350,000
Combined Cleansing Services Contract (CCSC)Refuse and waste related servicesPlanned2 Nov 2023£75,000,000
Arun Beach Hut ReplacementConstruction work for buildings relating to leisurePlanned14 Jun 2023—
Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for the Provision of Property Repairs, Maintenance and Inspection ServicesDPSConstruction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual housesOpen21 Apr 2023£52,500,000
Combined Cleansing Services ContractRefuse and waste related servicesAwarded / complete31 Jan 2023—

Search all 15 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 13 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.