Braintree District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of EnglandBraintreeRan 1 procurement for other authorities

Official UK PPONPGBP-7262-MJTR

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months35+17% vs prior 12 months (30)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot4.57.1% single-bid · 14 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 61 awarded procedures · 122 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

61 awarded tenders, 122 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1910 within 6 months · 3 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£38mnet · on 47 of 47 published values · top 5 = 92%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 65 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(61 notices)
    61 of 65 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework6%(4 notices)
    4 of 65 notices are Framework (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open34%(22 notices)
    22 of 65 notices are Open (34%).
  • Limited / restricted31%(20 notices)
    20 of 65 notices are Limited / restricted (31%).
  • Route not published22%(14 notices)
    14 of 65 notices are Route not published (22%).
  • Direct award12%(8 notices)
    8 of 65 notices are Direct award (12%).
  • Selective2%(1 notices)
    1 of 65 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5robust · n=147.1% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 18 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

29 daysrobust · n=18
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 65 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

021 of 65 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 9 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

11.3% below estimaterobust · n=9

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Happe Contracts34.9%33—
Gala Lights LTD23.3%2312 Jun 2026
HAGS SMP Ltdframework/DPS on 123.3%2317 Nov 2025
THE CONSORTIUM (EAST) LTD23.3%229 Apr 2026
Softcat Plc23.3%12—
Joscelyne Chase Commercial Limitedframework/DPS on 123.3%02—
Warwick Landscaping Ltdframework/DPS on 111.6%1417 Nov 2025
USTIGATE LIMITEDframework/DPS on 111.6%1217 Nov 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 61 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 122 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£38mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 47 of 47 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 92%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£44k middle valuerobust · n=47Middle half £30k–£133k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
BDC Leisure Centres Management - Interim ProvisionWealden Leisure Limited——£29,277,629 †
EPP0151First Call Contract Services Limited27 Jan 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,902,511
≈ £1.3m/yr
EPP0010CIVICA UK LIMITED——£656,400 †
Highway Verges & Visibility Cutting ServicesSkippers Ground Maintenance22 Sept 20252 yrs · up to 4 yrs£532,157
≈ £266k/yr
Play Area Improvements 2025HAGS SMP Ltd—1 mo£359,723 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

151 of 162 contracts carry an end date, 103 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 19 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 93 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Festive Light Scheme for Braintree Town CentreChristmas tree lightsAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026£190,000
Planning Support - Local Plan ReviewAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
Local Plan Review - SFRAAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Infrastructure Delivery PlanAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Reusable BagsPolythene waste and refuse sacks and bagsPlanning9 Sept 2026£150,000
Local Plan Review - Further Water Cycle StudyAwarded / complete28 Aug 2026—
3G Pitch Resurfacing and Anti-Climb Security Installation with MaintenanceConstruction-related servicesAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026£140,000
H120 RoadworksConstruction work for highwaysAwarded / complete10 Aug 2026£220,000
LicencesAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
Disaster RecoveryAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026—
Laptop provisionAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
Enterprise HouseAwarded / complete12 Jun 2026—
Play Area Improvements 2025Awarded / complete28 May 2026—
H120 FootpathAwarded / complete18 May 2026—
EPP0322-R1 NEEB Business Support (Re-tender)Miscellaneous business-related servicesAwarded / complete18 May 2026£160,000
Landscape Services Tree ManagementFrameworkTree pruning and hedge trimmingPlanning8 May 2026£630,000
EPP0010 Open Revenuescentral purchasing bodyIndustry specific software packageAwarded / complete24 Apr 2026—
Temporary WorkersSupply services of personnel including temporary staffAwarded / complete21 Apr 2026£3,250,000
EPP0233 NEEB Business LinkMiscellaneous business-related servicesAwarded / complete10 Apr 2026£148,628
Legal Library Materials and Associated ServicesFrameworkLegal servicesAwarded / complete1 Apr 2026£2,000,000

Search all 93 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 151 of 162 published contracts have an end date; 103 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.