Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentSouth East EnglandAmersham

Official UK PPONPHNT-5649-ZYQJWebsitebuckshealthcare.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months82+447% vs prior 12 months (15)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share18%of 102 awarded procedures · 80 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

102 awarded tenders, 80 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months95 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£33mnet · on 87 of 87 published values · top 5 = 43%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 97 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract94%(91 notices)
    91 of 97 notices are Contract (94%).
  • Framework6%(6 notices)
    6 of 97 notices are Framework (6%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted81%(79 notices)
    79 of 97 notices are Limited / restricted (81%).
  • Direct award13%(13 notices)
    13 of 97 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Open2%(2 notices)
    2 of 97 notices are Open (2%).
  • Selective2%(2 notices)
    2 of 97 notices are Selective (2%).
  • Route not published1%(1 notice)
    1 of 97 notices is Route not published (1%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

16.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 97 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 97 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Borras Construction Ltd76.9%77—
MTX Contracts Ltd65.9%66—
Marcon Construction Limitedframework/DPS on 154.9%55—
LOGAN CONSTRUCTION (SOUTH EAST) LTD43.9%44—
Stoic Roofing & Construction32.9%33—
IQVIA Ltd32.9%33—
Pyrotec Services Ltd32.9%33—
ALL GAS SOLUTIONS BUCKS LIMITED22%22—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 102 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 80 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£33mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 87 of 87 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 43%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£143k middle valuerobust · n=87Middle half £79k–£283k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
SMH Therapies Building workMTX Contracts Ltd——£7,822,965 †
EPR Community ExtensionAccess UK Ltd—3 yrs£2,174,780
≈ £725k/yr
ECG Monitoring ServiceIcentia Limited——£1,524,960 †
Radiology ReportingChiltern Imaging Partnership LLP——£1,500,000 †
SMH AMU and ED Refurbishment and RenovationMTX Contracts Ltd——£1,178,156 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

23 of 101 contracts carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 106 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
CLINICAL CODING ASSISTANT SOFTWARE LICENCES, HOSTING & SUPPORT CONTRACTIT software packageAwarded / complete24 Mar 2026—
VIE REPLACEMENT WORKS AT STOKE MANDEVILLE HOSPITALBuilding construction workAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026—
Healthcare Analytics ContractAwarded / complete17 Mar 2026—
CBRN Decontamination Unit Enabling Works at SMHBuilding construction workAwarded / complete17 Mar 2026—
PROVISION OF SERVICES RELATING TO ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD (EPR) BENEFITS & FINANCE SUPPORT SERVICESAwarded / complete16 Mar 2026—
LED LightingHospital facilities construction workAwarded / complete12 Mar 2026—
Works at the SMH Maternity DepartmentBuilding construction workAwarded / complete11 Mar 2026—
SMH Therapies Building workBuilding construction workAwarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
Wycombe General Hospital Redevelopment RIBA Stages 00-04 Infrastructure WorkBuilding construction workAwarded / complete27 Feb 2026—
Pharmacy Robot Construction WorkBuilding construction workAwarded / complete25 Feb 2026—

Search all 106 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 23 of 101 published contracts have an end date; 0 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.