Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentGreater LondonLondonRan 120 procurements for other authorities

Official UK PPONPJXH-4297-MQQWWebsiteclch.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months18-5% vs prior 12 months (19)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot212.5% single-bid · 8 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share17%of 36 awarded procedures · 36 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

36 awarded tenders, 36 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months33 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£8.0mnet · on 13 of 13 published values · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 37 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract92%(34 notices)
    34 of 37 notices are Contract (92%).
  • Framework8%(3 notices)
    3 of 37 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted35%(13 notices)
    13 of 37 notices are Limited / restricted (35%).
  • Direct award22%(8 notices)
    8 of 37 notices are Direct award (22%).
  • Open22%(8 notices)
    8 of 37 notices are Open (22%).
  • Selective11%(4 notices)
    4 of 37 notices are Selective (11%).
  • Route not published11%(4 notices)
    4 of 37 notices are Route not published (11%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 8 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=812.5% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 37 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 37 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

37.7% above estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Capita Business Services Ltdframework/DPS on 225.6%22—
Ontex Healthcare UK Limited25.6%2225 Aug 2026
London Autism Clinic Ltd25.6%22—
Aragon Project Management Ltd25.6%22—
Hugh Steeper Limitedframework/DPS on 125.6%12—
HSL Pathology LLP25.6%12—
Physio Med12.8%11—
Healthshare Ltd12.8%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 36 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 36 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£8.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 13 of 13 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 84%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£422k middle valuerobust · n=13Middle half £37k–£920k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
The Provision Of Sexual Health Pathology ServicesHSL Pathology LLP——£3,000,000 †
Continence Home Delivery - Brent CLCHOntex Healthcare UK Limited—11 mo£1,265,827
High Intensity User ServiceThe British Red Cross——£965,062 †
Brent Continence ServiceOntex Healthcare UK Limited—1 yrs£919,567
≈ £920k/yr
Child Development Service (CDS) in Brent for CLCH ONWLondon Autism Clinic Ltd——£524,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

15 of 36 contracts carry an end date, 5 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 75 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
-BMS Interim Extension Servicesprocuring entityAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Hammersmith & Fulham MHU Refurbishment Painting Worksprocuring entityAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Continence Home Delivery - Brent CLCHAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
– Avebury Ward Refurbishment Final Account Paymentprocuring entityAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
– Cath Lab 1 Refurbishment CDM Principal Designer Servicesprocuring entityAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026—
– Old Broadmoor Hospital Security Guard and Dog Patrol Sprocuring entityAwarded / complete19 Aug 2026—
Neighbourhood Mental Health Support Serviceprocuring entityCommunity action programmePlanned18 Aug 2026£800,000
Complex Emotional Needs for Adults Servicesprocuring entityGuidance servicesPlanned11 Aug 2026£645,000
Adult ADHD Assessment, Diagnosis and Medicationprocuring entityPsychiatrist or psychologist servicesPlanning7 Aug 2026£0
Mint Wing Structural Supportprocuring entityAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
–Total Waste Management Services (procuring entityAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Provision of Optune Therapyprocuring entityAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Managed Equipment Servicesprocuring entityAngiography suppliesPlanned24 Jul 2026£1,000,000,000
Telecoms consultancy serviceprocuring entityAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
CW Pharmacy Quality Assurance (QA) Servicesprocuring entity3 lotsMedical software development servicesAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026£300,000
THH - MVH Ventilation Projectprocuring entityAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
– Clayponds Rehabilitation Hospital Standby Generator Reprocuring entityAwarded / complete3 Jul 2026—
Provision of Project Delivery Services via NEPRO Innovation FrameworkAwarded / complete2 Jul 2026—
– Security Staffing Review Servicesprocuring entityAwarded / complete30 Jun 2026—
– (MEP Consultancy for PET CT Installation)procuring entityAwarded / complete24 Jun 2026—

Search all 75 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 36 published contracts have an end date; 5 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.