Department for Work & Pensions: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Ministerial departmentNHS ODS: GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTCentral governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPJCP-7274-TLRQWebsitegov.uk ↗

Open now3next deadline 30 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months158+90% vs prior 12 months (83)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot318.2% single-bid · 11 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 358 awarded procedures · 210 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

358 awarded tenders, 210 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8866 within 6 months · 15 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£2.2bnnet · on 191 of 191 published values · top 5 = 86%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

3 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 241 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(232 notices)
    232 of 241 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework3%(7 notices)
    7 of 241 notices are Framework (3%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system1%(2 notices)
    2 of 241 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (1%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award61%(146 notices)
    146 of 241 notices are Direct award (61%).
  • Route not published14%(34 notices)
    34 of 241 notices are Route not published (14%).
  • Open9%(22 notices)
    22 of 241 notices are Open (9%).
  • Selective9%(22 notices)
    22 of 241 notices are Selective (9%).
  • Limited / restricted7%(17 notices)
    17 of 241 notices are Limited / restricted (7%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 11 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=1118.2% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

94 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 241 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

028 of 241 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 6 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

3.5% below estimaterobust · n=6

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
MAXIMUS UK SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1164.5%019—
Reed in Partnership Ltd154.2%016—
Atos IT Services UK Limited133.6%013—
Capita Business Services Ltdframework/DPS on 1123.4%117—
Ingeus UK Limitedframework/DPS on 1102.8%015—
Ernst and Young LLPframework/DPS on 192.5%79—
PROGRESSION DEVELOPMENT LTD72%77—
Serco Limitedframework/DPS on 172%210—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 358 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 210 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£2.2bnSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 191 of 191 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 86%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£35k middle valuerobust · n=191Middle half £17k–£405k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
DWP Estates Security Services ContractG4S secure Solutions (UK) Ltd——£904,940,000 †
Functional Assessment Services (FAS) 2023 – Lot 2Capita PLC—8.5 yrs£681,730,070 †
≈ £80m/yr
The Functional Assessment Service (FAS) Lot 5 Northern IrelandCapita Business Services Ltd——£157,080,007 †
Media Buying & Planning ServicesWavemaker Ltd1 Jan 20264 yrs£95,000,000
≈ £24m/yr
Unified Network Access ServiceSoftcat Plc—5 yrs£40,613,333 †
≈ £8.1m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

335 of 391 contracts carry an end date, 59 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 88 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 444 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Pensions Commission Regional EngagementAwarded / complete28 Sept 2026—
CIPD EA UpgradesAwarded / complete21 Sept 2026—
Introduction to CybersecurityAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
DWP Jobs and Careers Service: Estates Multi Disciplinary ServicesConstruction project management servicesAwarded / complete18 Sept 2026—
Enterprise Excellence Master Class CoursesAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Sustainable AI Engineering CourseAwarded / complete14 Sept 2026—
Life Course and Life Events Analysis Pensions CommissionAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
BCS Membership 2026-2027Awarded / complete9 Sept 2026—
British Computer Society Membership 2025/2026Awarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
Postgraduate offerAwarded / complete3 Sept 2026—
The Work Health Conversation - and educational packageAwarded / complete1 Sept 2026—
Financial Reporting Council Levy 2026/2027Awarded / complete28 Aug 2026—
Internet Intelligence and Investigation - III Practitioner 1Awarded / complete26 Aug 2026—
MPA Membership 2026-2027Awarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
HHT Exit and Identity ModernisationAwarded / complete25 Aug 2026—
Applying Metrics for PredictabilityAwarded / complete24 Aug 2026—
Provision of Digital Forensic ServicesAwarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
RICS Recruit and Modus - Advertising Package - 2026/27Awarded / complete21 Aug 2026—
Payment Exception ProjectFinancial and insurance servicesAwarded / complete20 Aug 2026£22,532,075
Skills England Web-based Services - Development, Support & MaintenanceInformation technology servicesPlanned20 Aug 2026£1,000,000

Search all 444 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 335 of 391 published contracts have an end date; 59 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.