Financial Conduct Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)GOV.UK register: OtherOther public bodyGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPTYH-4442-XPRHWebsitefca.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months132+207% vs prior 12 months (43)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot411.1% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 184 awarded procedures · 341 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

184 awarded tenders, 341 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8139 within 6 months · 18 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£92mnet · on 134 of 134 published values · top 5 = 77%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 175 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract97%(169 notices)
    169 of 175 notices are Contract (97%).
  • Framework3%(6 notices)
    6 of 175 notices are Framework (3%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award55%(96 notices)
    96 of 175 notices are Direct award (55%).
  • Selective13%(22 notices)
    22 of 175 notices are Selective (13%).
  • Open12%(21 notices)
    21 of 175 notices are Open (12%).
  • Limited / restricted10%(18 notices)
    18 of 175 notices are Limited / restricted (10%).
  • Route not published10%(18 notices)
    18 of 175 notices are Route not published (10%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=911.1% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

91 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 175 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

011 of 175 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

8.2% below estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
PA CONSULTING SERVICES LTDframework/DPS on 363.3%41013 Aug 2026
Ernst and Young LLPframework/DPS on 363.3%32422 Oct 2026
MYPROTEUS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 152.7%5519 Feb 2026
Refinitiv Limited52.7%461 Jun 2026
Sopra Steria Limitedframework/DPS on 252.7%09—
The Berkeley Partnershipframework/DPS on 242.2%3521 Oct 2026
Infosys Limitedframework/DPS on 242.2%3416 Sept 2026
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPframework/DPS on 442.2%11819 Feb 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 184 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 341 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£92mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 134 of 134 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 77%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£94k middle valuerobust · n=134Middle half £48k–£154k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Media Planning and Buying ServicesWavemaker Ltd7 May 20264 yrs£28,333,333
≈ £7.1m/yr
LSEG Data AccessLSEG9 Jun 20267 yrs£15,955,448
≈ £2.3m/yr
AML Delivery PartnerBaringa Partners24 Jul 20261 yrs · up to 4 yrs£14,916,667
≈ £15m/yr
Procurement Consultancy SupportConstellia Public Ltd21 Sept 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£10,000,000
≈ £3.3m/yr
C4145 Early Careers Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO)Amberjack Global Ltd2 Jul 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£2,083,333
≈ £694k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

190 of 366 contracts carry an end date, 50 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 81 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 231 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
FRAME Data TeamAwarded / complete23 Oct 2026—
File ReviewAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
AML DTI Strategy SupportAwarded / complete22 Oct 2026—
Regulatory Experience: Validation of Dimensions and ScorecardAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
'Procurement Ai as a Service' Proof of ConceptAwarded / complete12 Oct 2026—
e-Learning Financial TrainingAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Early Careers Marketing & AttractionAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Early Careers Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO)Assessment centre services for recruitmentAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026£2,083,333
Records Management Consultancy SupportAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Court Transcription ServicesAwarded / complete9 Oct 2026—
Procurement AI - Role of an Evaluator Proof of ConceptAwarded / complete8 Oct 2026—
Leadership DevelopmentAwarded / complete6 Oct 2026—
SMF - Project ManagerAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Contingency Supervision HubAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
DTI Strategy Support - AML planningAwarded / complete2 Oct 2026—
DFU NIMBUS Servers (x4)Awarded / complete28 Sept 2026—
Procurement Consultancy SupportAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026—
Financial Promotions DataAwarded / complete24 Sept 2026—
Project Manager ServicesAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—
Data ScientistAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026—

Search all 231 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 190 of 366 published contracts have an end date; 50 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.